Talk:Verna Pratt flowers

Peer Review: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Breano21/sandbox/PeerReview#Evaluate_an_article My teammates flaked so did an extra review on your article Breano21 (talk) 23:58, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Peer Review
This article does a good job of staying neural. I am a bit confused about the topic. I like that you included the bit about the Alaska Native Plant Society but it seems that it shouldn't be your lead as that is not what your article is about. I think your article does a good job of having information but could use a bit of organization and focus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EKFrance (talk • contribs) 04:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Peer Review
You did a great job at keeping this neutral. The organization was great, too. Extremely concise and to the point. I would only brush up on grammar. You implement good leads and a understandable, well done structure. I think you have a lot of pertinent information about plants - and I'm jealous because finding information about Verna Pratt that isn't from a blog is difficult. Anyway, stellar job, Carlos! Jasminealaska (talk) 07:22, 9 November 2020 (UTC)jasmine