Talk:Versatile Video Coding

Decoder Computing Power for the same PSNR
I would like humbly and politely ask is it true that Vvc = H266 = MPEGi has the same decoding computational processing power as:

HEvc = H265 = mpegH for the Same Digital Picture Signal to Noise Ratio?

I have heard that Vvc = H266 = MPEGi has double computational power demands for the same bitrate, however since the same bitrate has double Digital Picture Signal to Noise Ratio, so for the same Digital Picture Signal to Noise Ratio the bitrate is 2x lower = 50% and I could suppose it could be the same decoding processing power requirements.

What is more I have heard that for certain setting VVC decoding processing power is only 80% that of HEvc = H265 = mpegH for the same bitrate.

If that setting could generate double Digital Picture Signal to Noise Ratio, that would even mean that Vvc = H266 = MPEGi could have only 40% processing power of HEvc = H265 = mpegH for the same: Digital Picture Signal to Noise Ratio.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.202.138 (talk) 19:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

4 Licensing Patent Pools
Inside artile:
 * Four companies are vying to be the patent pool administrator for VVC, in a situation similar to the previous AVC and HEVC codecs.

I've seen on about 1h Youtube lecture that there will be 4 switchable patent pools, in similar ways to 21 switchable tools in EVC.

That in itself is positive as it gives trading leverage, because no single patent holder could render VVC encoder software unusable due to inability to acquire license in agreement with law.

I would like someone to find texted reference or link to this video, and incorporate that with Reference into article.

And The number of Companies who hold patent pools are much more than just 4, it is even much more than 16, it may be closer to 46 companies.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.202.138 (talk) 10:23, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Physical or Mathematical Law Patent Issues
I would like to read, maybe in See Also Section:

How it is possible that Video Codecs are subject of Patent:

as It is NOT Legal to patent physical or mathematical Law itself

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.193.238 (talk) 13:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

MP4Box GPAC
Does somebody know it GPAC player Android Development Version also handles VVC = H266 = MPEGi Playback too?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.193.238 (talk) 23:07, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Licensing cost for Broadcast in Free To Air
I would like to ask about License price for Broadcast in Free To Air business mode.

Is it Free as it were (at least in practice for some time) for its predecessors (H264, H265)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.201.79 (talk) 11:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

RPR inessential?
RPR is literally a standard essential feature. Palette is discussable, I can live with marking it inessential. Stop this propaganda. It's pathetic. 91.66.115.62 (talk) 19:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I've not found a single VVC file on the web using the feature. E.g. the anime community has been doing encodes for over a year (over a dozen of encodes), there are websites with VVC samples - nothing, nada, zilch. There's no need to call something "propaganda" just because you have strong opinions about something. WP is a source of factual data. Unless you can prove that RPR is widely used (it's not), it will remain under that moniker. If we change the wording to "essential" or remove the word "inessential" people might get the wrong idea that the built-in decoder is "broken" and does not support VVC. That's not the case. It works for 100% of my samples and encodes. Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 11:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)