Talk:Vertebrate

"Phylogenetic relationships" Outdated Taxonomy
The "Phylogenetic relationships" section of this article, while looking very well made, has some outdated taxonomy in it regarding Acanthodii and Placodermi groups. The biggest problem are the Acanthodians, which here are shown as being a spread across chondrichthyes and osteichthyes while more recent taxonomy has them all as stem-chondrichthyans. The Placoderms look alright, but they should mention "maxillate" placoderms like Entelognathus. I believe they should take the place of Diplacanthus on the diagram.

I would do it myself, but I'm unfamiliar with editing clade diagrams. Jvirus2 (talk) 22:19, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Tetrapoda are listed as a sub-class of Sarcopterygii in the main article body
Looks like there may be a problem with the layout of the list of classes in the main article body. For example, Tetrapoda appear to be listed as a sub-class of Sarcopterygii. 104.142.119.254 (talk) 10:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

"Ossea" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ossea&redirect=no Ossea] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 14:31, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

"Anatomy of vertebrates" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anatomy_of_vertebrates&redirect=no Anatomy of vertebrates] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 14:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)