Talk:Veteris

[Untitled]
Gwythr can hardly have been derived from *weteros, because in that position t would have gone to d; and why should the second e be syncopated? In Welsh, *weteros would have become something like *gweder; for Gwythr we're looking for something more like *wixtros. QuartierLatin1968 17:21, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Veteris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060211181501/http://www.indo-european.nl:80/cgi-bin/query.cgi?root=leiden&basename=%5Cdata%5Cie%5Cceltic to http://www.indo-european.nl/cgi-bin/query.cgi?root=leiden&basename=%5Cdata%5Cie%5Cceltic

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Veteris
Is there any evidence the name was Veteris in the nominative, as opposed to e.g. "Veter"? Draco argenteus (talk) 21:13, 16 December 2020 (UTC)


 * No, unless I'm mistaken, there isn't any such evidence. AFAIK the inscriptions all refer to Veteri in the dative. Q·L·1968 ☿ 23:43, 18 December 2020 (UTC)