Talk:Vettaikkaaran

Move?
So... am I correct that there's nothing left to move here? -GTBacchus(talk) 04:39, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Vettaikaaran → Vettaikkaran and Vettaikkaaran (1964 film) → Vettaikkaaran — The two film title are apparently spelt (slightly) differently, so dablinks between the two should be sufficient. The dab page would be better at the otherwise unused "Vettaikkaran". PC78 (talk) 13:34, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This difference in spelling is not very noticeable: put the date on both article names? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Agree with User:Anthony Appleyard. Put the date on both article names and then have all of the (undated) spellings link to one DAB page. —   AjaxSmack   18:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Agree with User:Anthony Appleyard having the 2 films and their dab page at 3 different variations of the same spelling that are highly likely to be indistinguishable to most general readers of Wikipedia is a recipe for utter confusion. I'm certainly confused already. --Rogerb67 (talk) 03:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Are the variations of the name really different Tamil language titles or just different transliterations? If the latter, a dab page is in order. Jafeluv (talk) 11:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I think we can knock this on the head. The 2009 film article was moved as suggested above, and I have no objection to doing things that way. PC78 (talk) 00:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. PC78 (talk) 20:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)