Talk:Via Flamina

I think your content is good and I really like your images. However, you might want to make sure they have copyright tags so they don’t get deleted. Could you possibly include the date of when Vespasian led his armies along the road? Also, it might be nice if footnotes were included in the text so that the reader can tell which information came from which source. Were you able to find a primary source? I wasn’t sure from the references section. - Ashley

Agree with Ashley's points. Also, I think an opening paragraph, before things break into sections, would help introduce the article. The organization seems like the actual route should go first, instead of the history, military uses, repairs, and then the route itself. Seems that should come before everything else; that is, one should know what we're talking about before you talk about it. The layout of the pictures doesn't seem consistent with Wikipedia style...but that's minor compared to the other things Ashley mentioned and I added to. -ZLS 15 May 2007 3:57PM CT

I need to footnote the article, definitely. And will change the order of the article to make it more wiki-style. Would it be better to put the images in with the opening paragraph and then one with the route to highlight it? Thanks! VinaChhaya 21:07, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Vina Chhaya

Merge
This should be merged with Via Flaminia. Via Flamina is a typo, I think. And rew D alby 13:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know which form is the correct one, but the articles should definitely be merged. Vidarfe (talk) 08:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This article has the name of the road spelled incorrectly. It should certainly be merged with Via Flaminia. Eponymous-Archon (talk) 22:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)