Talk:Vibecession

Article is Unbalanced
This article has several issues: Remusofreem (talk) 19:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) For one, vibecession seems unlikely to comprise a meaningful part of historical analyses of this moment a decade from now. This analysis smacks of recency bias and only provides one example: that of the current moment.
 * 2) For two the article is unbalanced and neglects other analyses from different POV (See here) that might argue that for example the perspective that the economy is weak is a reflection of a section of the population that is *actually* not doing well while other sectors are doing great.


 * agree. this should be deleted. The author page even redirects here. No relevance at all. This should be no more than a note (with opposing views) in a larger article about the political issue it is contextualized. Gcbwiki (talk) 16:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)