Talk:Vic Black

==Notice: This article does not verifiably establish == In my opinion, this article either does not verifiably satisfy the Notability criteria for, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Untitled
Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable sources in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make some constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. — 141.156.165.77 (talk) 21:44, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * This article clearly fails on WP:ATHLETE, the subject has not yet achieved any significant success which makes him an encyclopedic personality. Lack of coverage and reliable source worsen the possibility of its being included into Wikipedia. I would recommend AfD on this for better conclusion. Hitro  07:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)