Talk:Vic Rawl

Authorship
I am the author of the Facebook group text that has been modified for use here. I would ask that this page not be deleted again. I work on Vic's campaign and am full authorized to use this text. Harlanh001 (talk) 16:57, 1 June 2010 (UTC)harlanh001


 * Sounds like a WP:Conflict of interest to me. Wikipedia isn't meant to be a billboard for others' advertising, commercial, professional or cause-driven. This policy clashes with the practical difficulty that those with the most knowledge and interest in putting out information about relatively-unknown things and people often have strong reasons to support or oppose the subject. But that's why there's a policy, worked out through years of passionate discussion. On the other hand, most of the article's text is pretty factual, although a hypothetical opponent on the Charleston City Council might write the last section differently. —— Shakescene (talk) 19:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Harlan001 Why don't you mention the results of the election or the challenge to the results? Paragoalie (talk) 21:01, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Vic Rawl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100619103408/http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com:80/_news/2010/06/16/4517878-sc-dems-to-hold-hearing-on-greene-tomorrow to http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/06/16/4517878-sc-dems-to-hold-hearing-on-greene-tomorrow

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)