Talk:Vicki Kraft

This article lacks biographical information.
While it may be true that Vicki Kraft's present notoriety is as a supporter of Trump's claim of widespread election fraud, this Wikipedia article lacks information about other aspects of Rep. Kraft's profile such as her upbringing, education, business experience, and legislative record. Focusing on her fringe obsession might be unfair. The article also seems to cast aspersions on the legitimacy of her own elections by emphasizing how narrow her victories were. Doesn't that seem unintentionally ironic to the point of being hypocritical? I don't know, maybe she deserves having her entry in a general knowledge database be weighted negatively to such an extent.
 * You' re more than welcome to add biographical information with sources. As for her narrow victories, I think the text doesn't come across as questioning the legitimacy of her election but that her victory was numerically speaking, a narrow win. As for her fringe views, the sources are what the sources are. A "Controversies" section can be be made to house her fringe views while other sections about her biography can be added in. Again, if you want to add biographical info, go right ahead. I may add info if I can. Update: Added some bio info but rest of the text and coverage is good as it is.SlackingViceroy (talk) 17:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Free speech
Is it true Of Elon Musk taking over Wikipedia? 97.120.123.109 (talk) 04:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)