Talk:Vicky Xu

A carefully curated repository for Western anti-China propaganda
I made an edit regarding a detailed analysis of ASPI’s 2020 report “Uyghurs for sale”. My post was a statement of fact. Co-West-Pro Consultancy did subject ASPI’s report to a detailed analysis from a legal perspective and they did come to the conclusion I stated.

My post had been removed in less than one hour, under the pretext that the source was not reliable. No explanation was given as to why the source was considered unreliable. The almost instant removal of my post adds to the impression that Wikipedia is rapidly becoming a carefully curated repository for Western anti-China propaganda. If you wish to reference a credible rebuttal of Co-West-Pro’s analysis, by all means do so. I will not interfere with it. But please do not remove the factual information I posted simply because it does not conform to your anti-China propaganda narrative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forsey (talk • contribs) 19:33, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * My edit has been reverted three times, with no reason provided, by an anti-China bully. This kind of behaviour is making Wikipedia a laughing stock. No wonder more and more people are turning away from it as a source of reliable information. I’m not going to waste any more time with it. Congratulations. Forsey (talk) 22:23, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Reasoning was clearly provided... WP:RS and WP:BLP. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 22:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)