Talk:Victor Bruns

Infobox
I suggested an infobox, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * COMPOSERS. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * From this guideline, dated 2010: "is determined through discussion and consensus among the editors at each individual article". I am one of the editors of this article, actually the one who added most of the refs, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I have no objections to you adding an infobox, but I'm not sure how they really help in bio articles.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:20, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think it would, in this case. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * This does not look good :-(   -- Moxy (talk) 22:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * FYI, Moxy, . - Voceditenore (talk) 11:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You got it ....to quote your link "I ask Nikkimaria to follow my edits to improve English and formatting, but please not revert an infobox without prior discussion". What happened was the exact opposite of what should have taken place. Just think its a bit much ...how many more content editors will we loose because they are treated like children? We have to make sure all are treated equally and without malaise. -- Moxy (talk) 17:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * "Anyone is free to revert any edits made in violation of a ban, without giving any further reason and without regard to the three-revert rule". While it is indeed unfortunate that this exchange occurred, no "malaise" (or malice, for that matter) is involved. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:31, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Would be best to take the high-ground over harassing an editor that is clearly here to help. What we are looking for is people that get the bigger picture and understand how to approach each-other. If your not able to get along best both disengage from one and other. As I said before it simply looks bad on your part...as in you have it in  for this editor despite the editors wonderful work and effort to get along.  -- Moxy (talk) 18:51, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Sound advice, which I'm sure would be helpful to all involved. Returning to the topic of this article: as project guidelines recommend against the inclusion of this template and there have been no contradicting arguments, I suppose the matter is closed. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)