Talk:Victor Gardthausen

In the light of history
It would help those of us who are ignorant of palaeography to hear, briefly perhaps, how well his analyses from 135 years ago have stood up to more recent discoveries, datings and interpretations. What did he get right, what wrong? Probably much of this is at Palaeography but a summary here would be helpful.TSRL (talk) 22:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * We are talking about edition from 1911-1913 (not 1879 - two volumes / one volume). This edition is often quoted by Metzger, Parker and other present scholars. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 22:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC)