Talk:Victor Stănculescu

Defence minister, or something more?
The article appears to imply that the Defence Minister has power to convene an entirely irregular military tribunal, that is of course wrong. It appears also to imply that Stanculescu chose inaction during the early stages of the revolution in some capacity other than as defence minister. Is this correct?122.59.213.223 (talk) 22:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)