Talk:Victoria Gillick

Untitled
I'm a newbie, so I don't know best how to address this issue, but: ...so something is wrong with the presented timeline Alecmuffett (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:56, 16 October 2011 (UTC).
 * 1) The Telegraph article cited is from 2000, not 2002 - this is a bug that needs fixing
 * 2) There is a article from December 2002 at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2569063.stm which says that Victoria Gillick *won* damages, and is not covered.