Talk:Victorian era/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 18:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments
Well, this is a remarkable improvement. I have a few very small comments that may be worth actioning.


 * The artist of the lead image should be wikilinked in the caption, and I suggest named in full as it's the first instance. ✅


 * The caption to the painting of Rorke's Drift should name the artist and provide the painting's date. ✅


 * The image "Slum area in Glasgow (1871)" is missing its "|upright" parameter.

, it would be very helpful if you could give me a heads up on progress, both by indicating below each comment when you have actioned or otherwise responded to it, and if you're away for a period when you will be resuming editing. Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:07, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

apologies, I hadn't updated the review for a little while as I got distracted by other things. I probably won't get a chance today but I will find publishers, ISBNs and have a look for Atterbury-2012 on the bibliography page over the next few days. The only thing I probably can't do anything about is page numbers as I don't own most of these books.--Llewee (talk) 14:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Many thanks. In that case, the refs without page numbers will basically have to be replaced with refs to other sources, as we can't create a GA with a set of partial citations. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:04, 6 May 2023 (UTC)


 * , do you have a plan for completing this GAN which includes getting everything cited, one way or another? Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:39, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * @Chiswick Chap I have bought a general reference encyclopedia on the Victorian era which I should be able to use to fill in the gaps where book page numbers aren't available. Llewee (talk) 21:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I think all the issues with references have been dealt with. I've added ISBN's where possible but it was quite hard finding some of them, especially for the older books.--Llewee (talk) 04:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Well done, and thank you, I hope you are pleased with the result. For future reference, the usual thing with older books that don't have ISBNs is to provide the OCLC. There is no quid pro quo with GANs but if you'd like to pick an article or two from the GAN list, it'd be much appreciated. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)