Talk:Victory Road (2004)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I am reviewing your article for GA. I went through it, copyediting it some. The article seems very good. There was one sentence I did not understand: &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 16:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * "Afterward, Jarrett retrieved the championship..."
 * I believe I fixed it.-- Will C  20:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks good! &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 01:51, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

A good, clear article! Passes GA. Congratulations! &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 01:51, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable  c (OR): No OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Sets the context b (focused): Remains focused on subject
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thanks, it is good to have TNA's first PPV under GA status.-- Will C  09:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)