Talk:Video clip

This was made a rediredt to music video in October 2002. That is not only now incorrect but the world of video clips has dramatically changed in the last few months, makinmg an article now fully justified, SqueakBox 15:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Google Video
Google Video may not be a producer, but it is a provider, which is the what I was going for in the list. While most videos are from other sources, it does also have locally hosted content (see Google Video Upload Program). User:Pimlottc (forgot to sign)

Moreover, with the way videos are presented on Google Video, many users don't realize the distinction and know a clip as being "at Google Video". Pimlottc 05:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC) Can you source this last claim. I still don't believe you have givena good reasonn to include Google video and not say yahoo video, Blinkx etc, SqueakBox 14:05, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

I have added google and yahoo video to the search. I would point out that Google Video does not have its own article hence it should be linked in the EL section. ifilm and you tube do ahve their own articles, SqueakBox 14:14, 27 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Er, Google Video does have its own article (I had it linked when I added it) Pimlottc 02:35, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Video sharing community websites
There's around 100 video sharing sites now. I propose we move this list to a new wiki page. It goes beyond the definition of "video clip" and more into video sharing.

--119.160.116.36 (talk) 17:22, 17 February 2017 (UTC)== Video clips. ==

"Video clips are short video clips," for real?

Title Change proposed
I think the title video clip is not enirely descriptive of the content of this article. It might be changed to webvideo. See the discussion on Talk:Webvideo for details. Titusn 09:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

We already have an article, IMO badly named, called webvideo. That article should be merged here, SqueakBox 21:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This is the correct title; Webvideo is a neologism in English. &mdash;dgies tc 22:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Good work, SqueakBox 20:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I am not quite sure why webvideo is merged with video clip. These seems to be quite unrelated concept in my mind. I mean, if webvideo where mainly made of video clip it was a technical matter more than a conceptual one. Now, you can see web video of any lengths on different sites - Vimeo feature half hours documentary, you can hardly equate that to a clip. I propose a complete new way to look at this. Clips should refer to very short film characterize by a kind of spontaneous nature - as opposed to most video for news report or music. Basically, the video clip is a format of video, a kind of video. On the other hand, webvideo should be seen as an umbrella term refering to the different form video take on the web. This would include: livestreaming (or webcasting), vloging, web-tv or video webseries, viral video, hypervideo, etc. The idea is to create a clear category for this new experience of video that provide interface for sharing, commenting, participating (chatting). I am putting this as a cultural category, ratter than a technical one. However, as more and more of these video are likely to be consume on mobile device, webvideo might be slightly fallacious. However, Internet video seems more appropriate in a technical category. Now, if webvideo is a neologism, why not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Videoqualia (talk • contribs) 20:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposing article split, please vote
I don't see how web video is the same as video clip. These are different things, and clips don't necessarily have to be put online to be part of web videos. Different concepts, they must be separated. I propose separation of web video and video clip. I don't care much about the latter, a clip is a clip, a piece of video, a scene, a take, unless you talk about what Europeans mean by video clip, that is, a music video. I would contribute to web video article. See the above comment as well. Mikus (talk) 02:12, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Video clip. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070328232558/http://www.businessweek.com:80/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2006/07/youtube_100_mil.html to http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2006/07/youtube_100_mil.html
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070507173036/http://www.redherring.com:80/Article.aspx?a=20843 to http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=20843
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060814044000/http://www.nefilm.com:80/news/archives/2006/02/podcasting.htm to http://www.nefilm.com/news/archives/2006/02/podcasting.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)