Talk:Video modeling

Quick review
I took a quick look at this article, spruced up the citations a bit, and have a few comments:
 * It's clearly a notable topic that should be covered in Wikipedia. Thanks for starting it.
 * It has too many direct quotes from sources. Generally we should be summarizing sources, not quoting them.
 * It is clearly promoting video modeling. It should be using a neutral point of view (see WP:NPOV).
 * It doesn't explain what video modeling is. That should be in the 1st sentence.
 * It is citing too many primary studies; it should rely on secondary sources such as reviews. See WP:RS and WP:MEDRS (MEDRS is marginally relevant, as video modeling is primarily an education but is also a medical intervention).
 * Some of the sources are a bit dated; we should be able to stick with stuff published in the last 5 years or so, for an actively researched area like this.
 * Here are some recent reviews in this area, which might be good sources (I haven't read them all, and don't have access to them all):

Eubulides (talk) 09:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)