Talk:Vietnam and the World Bank

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 October 2018 and 15 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): FENGDIAN YANG.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 October 2019 and 14 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jose Cajero.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments
Great job!! This was so impressive, I don't think you even need to edit anything or add more information. It was very thorough and well organized. I love that you explained things in depth and covered every aspect of the World Banks relation with Vietnam. I also love that you added an image. 1. I thought you had an introduction that was very thorough. 2. The structure was very clear and organized so well. 3. You covered every aspect of the relation between the World Bank and Vietnam. 4. The language was neutral and it was just a very informative article overall. 5. I love that you went above and beyong and added so many sources.

I really like your page overall! very good job and I appreciate the fact that you added pictures! If I was you the only thing I would review the wording of some of the sentences, for instance the first one after the coma you said "the once one of the..." 1. The lead section of your page is very well structured, you mention things that you discus later in the article. Very good job! 2. The structure is perfect! very easy to understand which is really helpful because there is a lot of detailed information. 3. You covered information well and you cited your sources correctly. 4. The content is definitely neutral, good job on that! no need to change anything. 5. Your sources are reliable and there is a lot of them, very impressive work on that! Orisvm (talk) 20:29, 7 December 2018 (UTC)orisvm

Poli 144D Peer Review
Hi @Jose Cajero, great job on the Wikipedia page! This is really nicely done

For the First Pillar, the lead section is informative and inclusive. You did a great job summing up WB's development in Vietnam with some of the domestic knowledge of Vietnam. However, the only problem is that I didn't see any link to citations, in which I am not sure if it can be subject to questioning, and it would be great if there can be several citations. For the Second Pillar, the overall structure is excellent, as I couldn't find many suggestions to give. If I were to be particularly picky, perhaps move the MIGA section under 'Strategic Partnership' below other WB groups right next to IFC. For the Third Pillar, the coverage is well-balanced between involvement(partnership) and significant projects, in which I can't find much to suggest. For the Fourth Pillar, I feel the language is objective, in which I can't detect any opinions from the author. For the Fifth Pillar, the sources are mostly from WB documents and websites, which I don't believe is a bad choice, as they are often non-biased and truthful. However, with the last section regarding the controversies, the entire section is based on one source, for which I don't know if it should contribute the amount of proportion to the page.

I feel like I am being extremely picky for the review, this is still one of the best pages I have yet seen. Runnan Yang @Ruy043 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruy043 (talk • contribs) 05:33, 6 December 2019 (UTC)