Talk:Views expressed by Michael Savage


 * so the tag says--I challenge that---it seems grossly undue weight for a relatively minor figure viewed in te compass of intellectual history. I propose a merge. This justification would expressed by, would serve as a subarticle for almost everyone in politics or political commentary.  DGG (talk) 00:43, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I support a merge. The material might perhaps be cut back somewhat or expressed more concisely. Skoojal (talk) 02:50, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I support a merge as well. Views that aren't referenced in secondary sources should be dropped. ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 00:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * A merge is a good idea. --Sloane (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree that a merge obviously makes sense. We don't have 'views expressed by...' articles for any other political figure; to focus on this one in particular (not even a politician, but a talk radio host) seems like an egregious case of 'undue weight'. It looks from the above like most people favour a merge; now we just need someone to carry it out... Robofish (talk) 02:13, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Should this be merged or just deleted? I would imagine that a brief summary or his programs and books would be enough to show his views without the undue weight and, frankly, needless expansion of the main article. I think that if there are points in this article that can be used to underscore another part of the main article, they would be useful, but a dedicated section to the views he expresses seems a bit redundant to me. Girasoleil (talk) 07:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Merging is a good idea. Though cherry picking a few key points (and I do mean few!), placing them in the main article and then deleting this page completely would make more sense. Just deleting completely would also be acceptable as his view are already expressed / summarised in the main article anyway, and this page is undue weight. In short, this page should go.2writer (talk) 21:28, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

There are an unusual number of Media Matters references. I believe there are many more accurate representations of Dr. Savage than those which Media Matters publicizes. Autumnal Obelisk (talk) 04:20, 9 May 2009 (UTC)Autumnal Obelisk

A citation is needed for the claim that Savage has expressed support for the Westboro Baptist Church. Assassin™ (talk) 18:28, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree that citation is needed, and since I read this, I've began listening to his program more in depth. I've found that most times when homosexual issues arise he leans towards a view along the lines of "I don't discriminate against the feelings two people have for eachother, regardless of gender, but it is socially de-moralizing and in the same way that we should not force our views upon them, they should not force their views upon us." This is neither a word for word quote of Mr. Savage, nor my personal endorsement of these views, but I think that in the interest of remaining NPOV, it's only fair to include ALL views he expresses on homosexuality, not just the ones that may appear convenient to editors, since that is the advertised nature of this article. Just an idle thought~ Girasoleil (talk) 08:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * checking, I see no topic here that isnt covered in summary in the main article, though there are one or two sentences that could fairly be added to increase the balance . The actual difference between deleting it and doing a merge, would be leaving the material here in the history behind the redirect that would exist after the merge . Opinions? DGG (talk) 01:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Why does it say he is "extremely critical" of atheists and then almost right after (next section) that he expressed "tolerance" to atheists? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.230.250.66 (talk) 01:39, 8 June 2009 (UTC)