Talk:Vijay (actor)/Archive 3

Semi-protected edit request on 8 February 2021
vijay is super mass hero 118.185.153.250 (talk) 07:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Volteer1 (talk) 08:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 June 2021
Nawin00 (talk) 08:42, 24 June 2021 (UTC) benalfin moses is the director of upcoming thalapathy 66 movie
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Princess Persnickety   (talk)  09:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 July 2021
To change the photo Msd fan (talk) 08:35, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Requested to change the new photo Msd fan (talk) 08:37, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. melecie   t  09:35, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Requested to change the photo of vijay that showed in infobox instead use this photo as it is recent photo. Msd fan (talk) 10:08, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Asking queries as a new user
How to upload a picture so that we should not get vandalism revert ? Please explain i am new user Msd fan (talk) 11:33, 4 July 2021 (UTC)


 * @Msd fan You have uploaded this image copying from an external website without a compatible license. This is a direct copyright violation. Please do not do that. -- DaxServer (talk) 11:52, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

How to get compatible licence ? Msd fan (talk) 12:34, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 July 2021
2401:4900:331B:D42C:7C7C:B3A4:4FB7:1B99 (talk) 05:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Sir we want to edit the Wikipedia please give chance to edit Wikipedia for vandalized page
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. melecie   t  08:09, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

please correct a sentence mistake
M. G. Ramachandran is the first highest grossing actor in Tamil cinema history, second is Rajnikanth and third Vijay.

could you please change the sentence to- By 2017, Vijay became highest grossing actor in Tamil cinema history behind veterans M.G. Ramachandran and Rajnikanth.

M. G. Ramachandran is bigger actor than rajnikanth he is a legend with many blockbuster tamil films under his belt. please alter it. his films use to run for many years. 123.215.16.234 (talk) 13:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Yes Mohammed NawafHaters (talk) 17:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Tax Evasion Controversy
On 8th July 2021, The Madras high court has imposed Rs 1 lakh cost on Tamil actor Vijay for failing to pay entry tax for import of a luxury car -- Rolls-Royce Ghost -- from England in 2012. The amount would go to the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister’s Public Relief Fund to fight Covid-19.

Dismissing the plea moved by Vijay, the judge said the actor had largescale fan groups. “Those fans see such actors as real heroes. In a state like Tamil Nadu, where such actors have become rulers of the state, they are not expected to behave like a ‘reel hero’. Tax evasion is to be construed as an anti-national habit, attitude and mindset and unconstitutional,” the judge said in the July 8 order released on Tuesday.

“These actors are portraying themselves as champions to bring social justice in the society. Their movies are against corrupt activities in the society. But, they are evading tax and acting in a manner, which is not in consonance with the provisions of the statutes,” Justice Subramaniam said. Rk151139 (talk) 10:34, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 September 2021
Please give me the opportunity to edit this i mam a verithanam vijay fan and i want to make the hard words a little easy 117.211.27.147 (talk) 13:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Full-protection-shackle-no-text.svg Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

sinhala
vijay 175.157.167.203 (talk) 01:32, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 February 2022
Change picture caption from 1996 to 1997 2601:408:C401:2B41:B517:F919:EC14:1E9F (talk) 19:44, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: why? The info given with the file is 1996 Vijay 1996.jpg Cannolis (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Vijays
She is not malayale she is tamil 212.39.176.22 (talk) 10:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 February 2022
212.39.176.22 (talk) 10:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC) his mother Shoba is of Hindu(tamil)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

"Vijay(actor)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Vijay(actor) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 17:54, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Privacy & Security
I strongly encourage the signature of vijay to be removed. Its not safe 119.56.106.100 (talk) 10:59, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 May 2022
The below sentence need to be removed as the mention of superhero is not true: "Vijay also experimented with superhero roles and found mediocre success with films Kuruvi, Sura, Velayudham and Puli.[259][260][76]" Kskarthicksundar (talk) 10:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

The below sentence need to be removed as the mention of superhero is not true: "Vijay also experimented with superhero roles and found mediocre success with films Kuruvi, Sura, Velayudham and Puli.[259][260][76]" Kskarthicksundar (talk) 10:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

There are no reliable source that supports the claim made in that article.

The claim being "Vijay also experimented with superhero roles and found mediocre success with films Kuruvi, Sura, Velayudham and Puli.[259][260][76]"

The mentioned movies are not superhero movies. Kskarthicksundar (talk) 15:28, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Citation 16 is wrong. Source doesnt have any mentions of superhero movie claim. Kskarthicksundar (talk) 03:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Kuruvi and sura are a superhero movies, His entry on sura and his 'jumping to the train' scene from kuruvi proved it. Kichawww (talk) 14:20, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Shoba is tamil not malayali
2001:8F8:1123:CA62:D9B3:BBC1:E3E2:2CF9 (talk) 17:23, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cannolis (talk) 17:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , this Vikatan source is cited to support that she's a Malayali. Is it reliable enough for such BLP material? -- Ab207 (talk) 07:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I think it should be. But don't stop looking for additional sources. Kailash29792 (talk)  08:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , thanks. So any claim otherwise would need a better source source than this. -- Ab207 (talk) 11:26, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

U Classicravi (talk) 17:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 1999 Vijay actor.png
 * Child actor Vijay 1984.jpg
 * VJ 2007.jpg
 * Vijay-IARA Award-The News Minute-Dec 13 2018.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thalapathy vijay.jpg

Removing tags while the discussion is ongoing
Hello, I request you not to remove the tags until there is consensus at the article take page. Please see WP:Tagging pages for problems. The tag "merely indicates the existence of one editor's concern, without taking a stand whether the article complies with Wikipedia policies." It may not mean the article actually violates NPOV. One should not remove the POV dispute tag merely because you personally feel the article complies with NPOV. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 12:06, 26 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I've restored the tags again which were removed by an IP editor — DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:24, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I have restored the tags once again as they were removed by 59.1.212.51. I've sent the IP editor a message that they have to come here to discuss their removal wait for a consensus to establish first before removing them. — Sirdog (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Fan POV
This page is mired with fan point of view. Any attempt at clean up seems to be reverted without any valid discussion. Therefore, tagged the page. Examples include:

1. The claim of "significant fan following globally", a lofty claim sourced only to tabloid article of TOI. Exceptional claims require exceptional sources which is clearly not met.

2. "Pan-Indian demand for his films, made him a sought-after actor in Hindi cinema". Again, this statement is not directly supported by the cited sources who reliability is itself questionable.

This page needs a large amount of clean up work. , please note and discuss your edits here. Thanks and regards -- Ab207 (talk) 03:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Ab207 yes, i agree that's why i removed. you can cleanup also Themodifie7 (talk) 03:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ab207 The claim significant fan following, popular celebrities in India are baseless. It needs to be clear. i had done it but later it was added again. so you clear it because you are senior editor. Themodifie7 (talk) 05:57, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

He's a well known guy in North India too. I dont't find any fan pov in this article instead if find it neutral they have called him an anti-national that's a big defame.5.192.183.227 (talk) 07:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @5.192.183.227 But still a single article can't define anyone's popularity and RTs tweets too Need big sources and material from prominent news media. Themodifie7 (talk) 07:29, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

'Pan Indian demand for his films' sentence and 'significant global following' are supported by reliable sources such as Times magazine and since he is current No1 pan India star by ormax source and Hindi dubbing rights high price sold source. Its all according to sources. Its neutral only. but personal life section is very negative.186.13.96.227 (talk) 09:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Pauldereck, please note that I have raised specific points. The tag should not be removed until the issue is resolved. Regards -- Ab207 (talk) 11:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Re this edit, we don't balance out any perceived negativity by adding unsourced puffery. That's not what NPOV intends to achieve. Every statement should be well sourced and neutrally worded regardless whether it's positive or negative. -- Ab207 (talk) 11:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ab207 absolutely that's what I am saying. Those statements are added without strong sources. they should have been removed. He is highest paid actor in India is enough to represent his whatever Stardom he is. Themodifie7 (talk) 12:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @186.13.96.227 Both are stupid, baseless and illogical sentences because many actors are much much popular and significant fan following than Vijay but there is no mention in their pages. but here Vijay's PR and fans are doing this again and again. Themodifie7 (talk) 11:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I read the whole article it seems to be neutral and there is both positive and negative about Vijay in the article. Kindly remove the unwanted heading tag. Thanks regards.49.207.205.76 (talk) 06:42, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The article contains quite an amount of content that is irrelevant to the actor, and is quite crappy. The tags need to be restored. I'll ask for protection again — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:45, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The Reception section and In popular culture section both were one-sided so completely removed and many irrelevant information were cleaned up its very neutral now. read the whole article now and point out your queries.59.1.212.51 (talk) 19:33, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The lead of the article is extremely non-neutral, let alone the whole thing. I may read the entire thing to help out with neutrality if the 2-3 IP's that keep coming to make some edits and then yank the maintenance tags would stop doing so and discuss here.
 * A massive portion of the lead is just regurgitating a portion of his filmography despite the fact we have an entire page for that already at Vijay filmography.
 * I don't see the necessity of listing out his winning of 4 different awards when we already state he is one of the highest paid actors in India. Perhaps pick 1 or 2 of those that are the most prominent.
 * The success of his masala film Thirumalai (2003) changed his on-screen persona to that of an action hero. - This is what we mean by fan point of view. His on-screen persona is going to change based on what role he plays... that is how acting works. There isn't a reason to mention this at all.
 * Vijay is among the most popular celebrities in India - We already state he has been listed multiple times in Forbes India's top 100 celebrities and that he is the one of the highest paid. Why do we need to declare this seperately?
 * Vijay's popularity has been recorded by both Google and Twitter as the most-searched-and-tweeted actor several times - This can apply to basically any international celebrity based on current events. What makes this happening to Vijay more prominent?
 * — Sirdog (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

I have changed the whole lead section removing and altering the contents as you stated above. Currently he is the highest paid actor in India as per sources earning 120 crores per film so I cannot remove the most popular celebrities in Inda changed it to "popular". a lot of content and sections were already removed and there won't be nothing left in the article but if you want to remove something remove it.58.136.163.71 (talk) 06:34, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I appreciate you addressing some of my concerns! I'll drop my concern on bullet 3 because it will become in my view a non-issue if my first concern is addressed, which I must remain firm on. What value do you see in the second paragraph of the lead? A lead should act as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents per our guidance on writing leads to articles. In what way does the 2nd paragraph do this? I think it needs to be removed wholesale. Note that if this is done that does not constitute me no longer possessing concerns.
 * If I have time this weekend I'll give the article a proper read-through and highlight any potential issues I see outside of the lead.
 * Unrelated to our content discussion, I have restored the tags. Again. It is not permissible to remove a maintence template when [t]here is ongoing activity or discussion related to the template issue per our help page regarding maintenance templates. This has been stated in varying wording and objected to ad nauseum . The existence of these tags is to highlight problems to be fixed, as is occurring here. They aren't there to disparage the article subject. Their consistent removal despite multiple objections with the invalid rationale of "lots of content has been removed" or "the tags no longer apply" is becoming disruptive. If they are removed again (without consensus) I will be querying after page protection and/or behavioral evaluation. — Sirdog (talk) 07:20, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I'll also state that I know I appear quite uncollaborative by authoritatively restoring the maintenance templates and bringing up my concerns but I'm not actually editing the article to address them myself. This is indeed unbecoming on my part, and I apologize. Again, if I have time this weekend, I'll start addressing any issues I see myself rather than just listing them here. — Sirdog (talk) 07:33, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I've gone ahead and moved forward with addressing my first concern from a couple of messages above, and will drop the matter regarding the templates in favor of building an encyclopedia. Went way too hard on that when the edits from the IPs (as of this edit) have been generally constructive. I'll go through and start doing some verification and neutrality work sometime this evening. — Sirdog (talk) 15:13, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Images of various eras
Several anon-IP editors seem to think we should not have an image of Vijay as a child in the section about his childhood, where one has been included for a long time. I think it's clearly on-topic and provides a nice alternative to the more-polished modern images of him in various posed or celebrity activities. Anyone want to add their opinions here? DMacks (talk) 06:01, 6 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Yes, they are very much encyclopaedic. Please go ahead and restore them accordingly — DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:13, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 January 2023
In the No. Of Children the count has to be changed from '3' to '2'. SHARATHSHA07 (talk) 13:59, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * why? Lemonaka (talk) 17:04, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ Already done - the article and source support two children. Thanks!  Ravensfire  (talk) 18:30, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 January 2023
other_names       = Thalapathy Vijay,Atta Naayakkan,Illaya Thalapathy Visakhjs (talk) 00:49, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:51, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 January 2023
Remove Anil(🐿️) from name and Nickname. 2406:7400:C4:9F6A:59FA:751B:2B4:1074 (talk) 15:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting wait.svg Already done — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Instagram page
https://instagram.com/actorvijay?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=￼ Master jeeva vfc (talk) 04:42, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Thalapthy ENDRUM

RfC on whether to mention Vijay's son's name in the article
Should we remove the WP:BLPNAME comment placed on his personal life section? There has been a discussion at this talk page as to whether or not to mention the name of the BLP's son in this article. Given that the BLP's son has had a lot of media coverage since the tag was placed and I see no point in concealing his name now. Jeraxmoira (talk) 19:08, 30 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes, we should remove the BLPNAME comment. I'm fairly certain his son's name is now in the public domain and see no real reason to hide it here. Ortizesp (talk) 20:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment, WP:BLPNAME also says When deciding whether to include a name, its publication in secondary sources other than news media, such as scholarly journals or the work of recognized experts, should be afforded greater weight than the brief appearance of names in news stories. Consider whether the inclusion of names of living private individuals who are not directly involved in an article's topic adds significant value. The presumption in favor of privacy is strong in the case of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved, otherwise low-profile persons. Are there arguments that support these additional considerations? Entertainment news most often covers him as Vijay's son. Senorangel (talk) 02:16, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Before 2022, he was covered as Vijay's son. You can google his name now(Jason Sanjay) and the results on page 1 are all from reliable sources. He has appeared in one of Vijay's films, Vettaikaaran, and also has signed an agreement to direct a film under the production house Lyca Productions This also works as a secondary source if I am right. To conclude, the articles you see on the internet are not trivial mentions when the news itself is about him/ his actions. Jeraxmoira (talk) 04:43, 1 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Leave the son's name out - trivial and name-dropping, and adds no significant value to understanding the topic of this article. His son's name is included in the cast section of the movie, and I'm not sure it even belongs there since he is non-notable. Isaidnoway (talk) 00:11, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * How are these trivial and name dropping? . Per Wikipedia policies he is not note worthy yet to have a standalone article but that doesn't mean that he is non-notable. Jeraxmoira (talk) 13:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If you want to mention Vijay has children, a son and daughter, that is fine, but there is no need to mention non-notable trivial cameo appearances in films. And FYI, I generally oppose adding children's names to any celebrity BLP article, unless the kid has one themselves. How does name-dropping a celebrity kids name help me better understand the topic of the article? It doesn't. Does Vijay's notability derive from the mere fact he has children? No, it does not. And since you acknowledge the kid is not note worthy enough to have his own article, and we let this content slide into the article, there is a more than likely scenario, this article becomes a magnet to mention and/or add additional content about Jason, because after all, he doesn't have his own article. Isaidnoway (talk) 18:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I think you misunderstood the whole point of this RfC. It's not completely about adding his name because of a trivial cameo appearance in a single film. If I am right, his name was concealed because 1. There was no coverage of him previously 2. WP:BLPNAME. Right now, none of the use cases of WP:BLPNAME applies here because of the coverage he has now. When he is discussed on articles from reliable news media on the internet, I don't see a point in concealing his name. Just like how Vijay's wife's name is mentioned on the Personal life section
 * As for your second point, I cannot comment on a whataboutism, which will eventually lead to many others. Jeraxmoira (talk) 19:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

is it possible to add the actual Leo story in wikipedia as stated below
Parthiban sitting with his family at night and telling them a story is the only real incident in the film and that story is Leo a flawed violent imaginary story with LCU connect narrated by him to his family members. The family members his wife daughter and son imagine themselves as the characters in the Leo story and his wife also imagines parthiban as Leo Das. The family members imagination is what we see on screen. You can understand if you watch the Leo trailer now and connect it with the Leo film.175.192.111.50 (talk) 21:08, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Add this sentence in the lead
He has appeared over 67 films predominately in Tamil cinema -change the sentence to- He has played the lead in 67 films and the International Business Times framed him as a 'consistent performer'. source pinkvilla.com below https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/south/thalapathy-vijays-2023-net-worth-annual-income-seaside-bungalow-expensive-cars-and-more-1206152 103.74.122.85 (talk) 10:56, 8 November 2023 (UTC)


 * International Business Times is considered generally unreliable per WP:IBTIMES. The article came out in 2017 and there has been 7 films after that. So, both should not be conveyed in the same line. Jeraxmoira (talk) 13:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)


 * International Business Times is generally considered unreliable meaning not all the time in some cases International Business Times is considered reliable and the same information it is cited by pinkvilla a trustworthy source stating the same as International business times that Vijay is a consistent performer you can still use the info and mention it in the lead since its cited by trustworthy pinkvilla source and attach the pinkvilla source as the reference not IBTimes. Many thanks for the reply103.74.122.85 (talk) 18:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Pinkvilla cited IBT which makes the Pinkvilla article unreliable as well. See WP:FRUIT Jeraxmoira (talk) 19:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 December 2023
Premodinately Tamil, and Telugu 76.20.43.25 (talk) 01:57, 3 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 08:00, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 December 2023
49.205.32.111 (talk) 12:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC) Hi please edit and add the sucess of Vijay's latest movie leo, add information of how it earned 620 crs in box office and became his highest grossing film and one of the highest grossing Indian films
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Shadow311 (talk) 16:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 December 2023
Hi sir I would like to inform you that I would like to edit the Wiki page of doctor and producer Mr Vijay I swear on my life I'll give the best edit of my life. AryaPadaiKadanthaAurelius (talk) 14:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  Delta  space 42 (talk • contribs) 15:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 January 2024
In 2023, he starred in the action thriller, Leo, playing the titular role directed by Lokesh Kanagaraj, marking his second collaboration with him after Master. It released worldwide on 19 October 2023 in Tamil, Hindi, Telugu, and Kannada languages.[145] The film's soundtrack was composed by Anirudh, in his fourth collaboration with Vijay.Leo became the highest-grossing film in Vijay's career earning over 620 crores Indian Rupees, Leo also became one of the highest-grossing Indian Films of all time 49.205.34.90 (talk) 16:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * even I can understand the changes what the above user is trying to make here he is trying to change the content about Leo film paragraph kindly do it or reduce the protection so that the above user can edit this page.179.27.200.61 (talk) 13:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Kindly remove non neutral tag I read the article it is neutral
kindly remove the non neutral tag the article is neutral I read it and one more thing remove Jason Sanjay as vijay's son he is actually vijay's step son born to Tamil actor jai Akash it is already mentioned by Vijay in old interview s that his wife was pregnant before marriage and only Divya Sasha is vijay's biological daughter and also Keerthy suresh's new born baby boy is vijay's biological son.94.127.212.209 (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You added the tag, without explaining why. Would you care to respond? ~Anachronist (talk) 15:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The UserAryKun won't respond since has placed the tag without proper reasons even though the article is neutral seems to be one of the blind hater of actor vijay. So administrator please remove the fan pov template. It's already a very small info article.179.27.200.61 (talk) 13:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * “Blind hater”? WP:AGF might apply here… GraziePrego (talk) 13:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * there has been fan wars going about this actor in social media he could be one among them.179.27.200.61 (talk) 13:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I just googled and found some poor sources stating Jason Sanjay his actually is Vijay's step son could you add that it would make the article sound more neutral.179.27.200.61 (talk) 13:42, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 February 2024
Vijay is the most popular and commercially successful actor in indian cinema,he was features in forbes india celebrity list in last seven occasions he is one of the highest paid actor in indian cinema 2409:40F4:32:5E8:D8F4:9599:8ACD:1CC3 (talk) 13:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 14:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 February 2024
I would like to add some news about actor Vijay's political entry Guhan Gunasekaran (talk) 07:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DMacks (talk) 12:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)