Talk:Vijender Singh/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Giants  27  ( Contribs  |  WP:CFL ) 22:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * He is credited for bringing back the sport of boxing into limelight in India. add the work the before limelight.
 * When Vijender was in standard five. What's standard five?
 * ✅ --Legolas  ( talk 2 me ) 04:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Could you add WP:ALT text?
 * ✅ --Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 04:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I'll place it on hold to allow for the changes to be made.-- Giants 27  ( Contribs  |  WP:CFL ) 22:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I did a brief overhaul of content between the sections, adding a bit of new content along with suitable references. I did a c/e of the article and I believe that it is in proper order (summary of my changes). Cheers, Mspraveen (talk) 05:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Added the alternate text. Please see if anything else is needed. --Legolas  ( talk 2 me ) 04:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks good, I'm now going to pass the article. Good work.-- Giants 27  ( Contribs  |  WP:CFL ) 19:55, 9 November 2009 (UTC)