Talk:Vilina Pećina

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... it consist literally two extremely concise sentences of dry technical information. Also, there was no discussion on possibility to improve what can be viewed as potentially harmful, which can be easily done. If these two sentences sound and appear too close to its source, I will easily reformulate them, if no other editor is willing to do that. This, I guess, would be much less invasive way to save legitimacy of Wikipedia, and much more constructive in regard encyclopaedia growth.-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99°  16:40, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Now, it's rewritten, as much as it is possible for a few sentences consisting almost entirely a technical information - after all, it wasn't as if you discovered 500 words plagiarized chapter/article, describing, creatively, some piece of historical artwork, or something.-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99°  17:16, 26 October 2018 (UTC)