Talk:Villain of the week

Appropriate for Wikipedia?
Feels like this falls more under the purview of TvTropes, as opposed to Wikipedia. Recommending deletion. 71.34.28.57 (talk) 17:52, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Painful to Read
The paragraph is so painful to read... Need an editor to clean up the language... It's so wordy. --Htmlism 13:22, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I will clean it up when I have the time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.99.187.99 (talk) 03:54, 10 March 2008‎ (UTC)
 * I’ve just rewritten it. Better? —67.14.236.50 (talk) 04:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Kingsphinx.jpg
Image:Kingsphinx.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Redirect to Wiktionary?
This article (without original research) is basically just a dictionary definition, and there don’t seem to be any sources discussing the subject beyond pointing out examples, so there’s no encyclopedic content. Should we make it a soft redirect to Wiktionary? —67.14.236.50 (talk) 05:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)