Talk:Villains by Necessity

I do not understand why I am being warned against advertising when I am not advertising anything. I am explaining the contents of a book that has been out of print for several years. I have seen similar explainations throughout this web page. The Gnoll 03:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

"nonnotable book"? How is that a reason to delete the article?
I am with The Gnoll on this so what if the book is not on any top 10 list it is still apart of our history and there for should be left there for future generations to find and identify with. Now I have actually read this book and I believe it is better than some of those top 10 because unlike them this book is original.Yes it has a black knight in it but if you have read the book you would understand that he is there for a really good reason. Plus this book deals with ideas that most people are afraid to look at like rape, point in fact this book shows how the "Good Guy" character can lose it and do something so honorable that no one would believe it. Then it show on the other side of the coin that even tho They are the "Bad Guys", they have there own morality and rules that even we can agree to as good standing rules. Basically this book shows that even the worst of us can do the right thing while the best of us can do the worst thing.so to say that this book is "non-notable" to me that's saying ether you have never read it and judged it buy its cover or you were looking for some book trying to find the first reference to the black knight. That or trying to find the Martin Lawrence film "The Black Knight" ether way i don't think any one has a right to say a book is non-notable sense every book has meaning to someone somewhere.And on a personal note i do still have this book and i plan on leaving it to my children when i die. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lear55 (talk • contribs) 19:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

I do not understand the reasoning. First, this article was dubbed as "advertising" when it clearly wasn't and threatened for deletion and now that it has been proven otherwise it is threatened for deletion again because someone simply judges it as a "non notable book"? I have seen many books that have little to no importance to our society on this web site. Everything from out of date comic books to videogames, movies, and old books that I've never heard of are on this site...so how is the simple random judgment of what is "Non notable" in any way valid here? The author is mentioned on her own page in the encyclopedia, but why is she there if none of her works are notable anyway? There has been no logic sense to these excuses to delete this article and no one has even bothered to try and explain them. The Gnoll 15:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Only three pages link to the author's article, which is very short. The only link to this book is one of those of the author, and it it only because the book refers to a black knight.  I agree that this book isn't notable at all.  I would suggest allowing this page to be deleted, and include a summary on the author's page.  Thanks, Reywas92 Talk 21:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

The summary looks like what was on the inside dustjacket leaf...
But alas, I cannot check it to the book because it's been removed from my local library. Anyway, I don't think it's an 'original essay', but I could be wrong. To me, this article seems stub-ish. It is a pity the book is out of print; I thought it a rather original take on the fantasy genre. 63.239.240.1 17:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Villains by Necessity.JPG
Image:Villains by Necessity.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I enjoyed this book--it may not have been a best-seller, but then again, how many books are? I seriously doubt that the author of this piece was trying to "advertise;" they merely were trying to inform the public about the contents of a book should anyone be interested in knowing what the book is about. While this is just my opinion obviously, I vote to keep the article and clean it up a bit. --168.18.163.159 15:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)