Talk:Villains in Power Rangers Operation Overdrive

Zord references
Noting the certain villians modeled after Zords from the first Power Rangers series.


 * Moltor: Megazord
 * Kamdor: Shogun Megazord
 * Mig: Red Dragon Thunderzord/Thunder Megazord
 * Benglo: White Tigerzord/Mega Tigerzord
 * Cheetar: Tor the Shuttlezord
 * Crazar: Predazord
 * Flurious' Ultimate Form: Super Zeo Megazord

If acceptable to give them here in discussions, will be upgraded. Fractyl 04:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * No. We are not doing that here, as it was only done in Sentai because it's older. There are too many PR characters based off of Sentai robos. We are not doing the Zord references at all on this article.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 05:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Hence placing them on discussion, though I think the villians are "more-key" as so far in terms of most of them modeled after the first Zords that came to the US during MMPR. Fractyl 14:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Fearcats.jpg
Image:Fearcats.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:14, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Flurious might need his own article
I think Flurious should have his own article as he has enough information i think. Should he have his own article or should he stay a section like the others. Mythdon (talk) 06:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * What we need to create an article is real world information. I don't think that creating an article on any fictional characters lately is a good idea unless there's critical commentary on the characters. I think the mention in this article is sufficient.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 06:48, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe not for Flurious, but probobly for Power Rangers characters with much more important history. Nah, i won't even bother with Flurious, as there has been Power Rangers characters with more history than him, and still without their own articles. Mythdon (talk) 06:58, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Boukenger counterpart mention inclusion
I would like to add a piece of information on each of the characters sections stating who their Boukenger counterparts are. If this is rejected, is it because of the fact it is trivial or the fact it is original research. Mythdon (talk) 00:24, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * WP:OR. Plain and simple. Unless Disney says the source, then we can't assume as such.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 00:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I assume thats why you guys removed the mentions of counterpart from Villains in Power Rangers: Mystic Force. Mythdon (talk) 01:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Bingo.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 01:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)