Talk:Villem Lüüs

Notability problems
The article has two different sources, of which is independent from me and  is clearly independent from Villem Lüüs. I don't see the reason why this can't be an article when there is an article about him in Estonian and Russian language version of Wikipedia. Avjoska (talk) 06:54, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Now the subject is covered in et, ua, ru wikis. Still unnotable in enwiki? Avjoska (talk) 19:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Someone to try to acclaim cross-spam????? ha-ha? what is the brake here? Avjoska (talk) 20:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Notability problems (to be continued)
I am not chess/draughts-related biographical articles expert. Now it seems quite obvious that Villem Lüüs is notable per WP:SIGCOV. More references and external link are added to show notability.

I removed the statement "Since 2004, he also was a volunteer editor and administrator in Estonian Wikipedia." Estonian Wikipedians know it is a valid statement, but his user page or other sources don't prove it.

May we resubmit this article after 2-3 failed submitings? --Estopedist1 (talk) 19:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Certainly, if the draft is declined, you can resubmit it. (If it is rejected, which is a different response, then you can't.) The point about declining is to give you a chance to rethink things. But please don't waste our time by resubmitting before you have truly addressed the problems. I don't know anything about the Estonian or other Baltic Wikipedias; maybe they have different rules, and they almost certainly have different ideas about when an Estonian person is notable. What you have to do now is study the rules in THIS Wikipedia and see what would be required to reach our standard. --Doric Loon (talk) 20:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)