Talk:Vilnius Castle Complex/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:11, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Thanks, M.K. (talk) 11:12, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I have placed a few citation needed tags, where statements are unsupported. Ref #11 is not a WP:RS.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just a few minor concerns with referencing. The prose is fair but verges on the clumsy at time,. I made a few copy-edits, but you may wish to cast another eye over it. It could stand improvement. On hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be notified. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:41, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just a few minor concerns with referencing. The prose is fair but verges on the clumsy at time,. I made a few copy-edits, but you may wish to cast another eye over it. It could stand improvement. On hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be notified. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:41, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Just a few minor concerns with referencing. The prose is fair but verges on the clumsy at time,. I made a few copy-edits, but you may wish to cast another eye over it. It could stand improvement. On hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be notified. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:41, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll check back next Monday. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:35, 23 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Much improved, I am happy for this to keep its GA status. One minor point - there is a tendency to over-use the term complex.  I fixed one instance in the lead.  It can be difficult to find a suitable term, but group of buildings, site, compound, structures are possible alternatives, though care needs to be taken to assses which is best for each instance.  Congratulations on an interesting artcile. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:34, 25 November 2009 (UTC)