Talk:Vincent-Marie Viénot, Count of Vaublanc

Peer review/Automated/September 2007
Made a semi automatic javascript peer review of this article. If it is a FAC it should not also be a good article nominee. As it is at B class - the article should probably have a peer review, then good article nomination, then FAC. Good luck with your article! SriMesh | talk  21:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Good article nominations Good article review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Develop (Expand) lead and address FAC comments b (MoS):   Address semi automatic peer reviewer check list of problems as listed above and at FAC.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Again as per notes in FAC b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * 1) It is stable.
 * 2) It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * 1) Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:


 * Check the what links here page for a possible additional section entitled See also which could provide internal wiki links to articles on this subject.


 * Reduce the amount of red links referred to in the body of the article. - Create these articles yourself, to help this article achieve a higher status.

Good luck with your article! SriMesh | talk  21:58, 6 October 2007 (UTC)