Talk:Vine Street, London/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 17:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Lede
 * Shorten "From the 18th to 20th century, it was home to Vine Street Police Station, originally a watch-house, but later one of the busiest police stations in the world, where the Marquess of Queensberry was charged with libel against Oscar Wilde. "
 * Done. As I believe it is official Wikipedia policy to mention Oscar Wilde as often as possible, we can't miss him out! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  20:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * History
 * Should The Vine be italicized?
 * The pub? Don't think so, The Angel, Islington and Lamb and Flag (Oxford) aren't Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  20:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * "The station closed in 1940 alongside Marlborough Street Magistrates Court" -do you mean "along with" rather than "alongside"?
 * I do indeed, the station can't exactly grow legs and move to the Magistrates Court Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  20:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Events
 * "the station was believed to be haunted by his ghost" -was?
 * I think in this context I used the past tense because the station has closed, though the building is still there - what do you think. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  20:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Have there been any recent ghost reports of it? If so it should be "is" I suppose.♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if Russell Grant's blog counts as a reliable source, but there's nothing to say the ghost policeman has definitely gone, so "is" it is. (In your face Clinton). <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  09:20, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Haha! I suppose it also depends if Grant visited to comminucate with one of them and sat on one of the ghosts with his fat arse. You'd think that alone would be enough to scare the ghosts off, him just being in the room would be an effective exorcism ;-)!♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Knowing how little can really be written about this tiny street you've done very well I think!♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Wait, wait, we forgot a junction list! Here you go!

Aaah, that's better.... <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  13:45, 8 March 2016 (UTC)