Talk:Violaceae

Merge proposal
I do not see the need for having two articles - the "Violaceae" is merely a stub with a taxobox, and the "Taxonomy ..." is a two-screen list. Putting all the information in one place would only be of help to the reader. It is not a genus or species article, so its main value is exactly from the botancal point of view. -- Goldie (tell me) 18:37, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Agree 100% - MPF 10:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Stub page
The taxonomy is unreferenced and is not the only one available. Link is dead. Andyboorman (talk) 16:27, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Violaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090107142255/http://www.chileflora.com/Florachilena/FloraEnglish/PIC_FAMILIES_SIMPLE_148.php to http://www.chileflora.com/Florachilena/FloraEnglish/PIC_FAMILIES_SIMPLE_148.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:02, 10 December 2017 (UTC)