Talk:Violence against women in the Philippines

Mistake
I've made a mistake, it should read, Violence Against Women in the Philippines. Anyone know how to fix this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susanbryce (talk • contribs) 06:20, May 2, 2010‎
 * Looks like Qwerty Binary moved the page to the appropriate capitalisation. Gobōnobō  + c 19:36, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Removal of dramatization picture
This picture is not reflective of the overall article. I would like to find an alternative if possible, as you can't even determine the genders of either individual in the image. -TheCaliforniaKansan (talk) 18:25, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Violence against women in the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ASIANOW/south/11/11/bangladesh.acid.ap/index.html
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.cbc.ca/thelens/heaven_facts.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 14:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Violence against women in the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.webcitation.org/5OzhDYYFa
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160116103319/http://ecpatinternational.com/EI/Resource_newsclippings.asp?id=928 to http://ecpatinternational.com/EI/Resource_newsclippings.asp?id=928

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Violence against Filipino women is unnecessary
Every country, ethnic group, caste, religious group had experienced sexual violence by insiders, outsiders, foreign conquerors, colonizers. Just like for Germany/Iraqi/China/India/Pakistan alone you could write a long page of thousand years sexual violence suffering and you can do the same with every ethnic group in the world. If you can write a historical page about " Violence against women in the Philippines " than I see no reason why anyone or even trolls can't do the same against any other ethnicity in the world, that's why there shouldn't be such a long history for just one ethnic group.

Note: User talk:121.214.36.82 is not moderator and uses a proxy address nor hold any rank in wikipedia but has giving me fake warning messages 2 times by intimidating to be a moderator. He send warnings so that he can scare people into not challenging his authority. The link is here ---> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:77.100.234.159&diff=828544856&oldid=828544012  he takes advantage of the fact that other moderators have given me warning a long time ago ( half year ), my last edit had been since half year ago and this user uses a proxy address

- (77.100.234.159 (talk) 08:56, 3 March 2018 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.234.159 (talk)
 * Doesn't stop me from asking for a page to be protected. I have been editing Wikipedia for more than four years and this is not the first page that I have successfully asked to be protected. Move on. (121.220.54.135 (talk) 23:44, 3 March 2018 (UTC))
 * How I am suppose to this discuss if you're ignoring the the topic. Obviously you had asked for this page to be protected but you ignore discussing the core of the problem.  (77.100.234.159 (talk) 17:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC))
 * What am I ignoring? You're trying to make POV edits, why should I take you seriously? Not to mention the despicable remarks you made against me, claiming I was a sockpuppet. Just look at yourself, you were evading a block using multiple accounts and IP addresses! How dare you have the audacity to claim I was a sockpuppet, my IP address changes because I don't have a static IP, I can't help that. I have no reason to engage in discussion with a POV-pushing editor. End of discussion! (137.147.22.168 (talk) 00:52, 9 March 2018 (UTC))

Socioeconomic abuse
Hello everyone,

I would like to add a new section titled socioeconomic abuse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Queenbook2021 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)