Talk:Violet Douglas-Pennant

Rating
I have completed a B class review of this article and believe that it meets all of the criteria for a B class rating. I am not an expert on the subject, so possibly cannot comment fully on coverage and accuracy, but it seems to cover the topic reasonably in my opinion. I believe that the article could possibly be taken further, if someone felt inclined to do so. If you would like more involved comments for improvement, you may like to submit it to the military history project peer review by adding it to the list at WP:MHPR. One improvement I might suggest is the addition of a photograph if one is available without breaching copyright. Of course, I understand though that sometimes it is not possible to obtain such photographs. Anyway, good work. AustralianRupert (talk) 03:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks! There is a photograph, and we certainly won't be able to get another one (what with her being dead and all) but it was taken in 1919, unfortunately, and I don't think there is a Fair Use tag that covers it. Ironholds (talk) 03:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

1929 libel case
The account is incomplete and so inaccurate, it makes no mention of her successful libel action in the King's Bench Division in 1929. jmb (talk) 17:40, 16 March 2018 (UTC)