Talk:Virabhadrasana/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 09:42, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Many thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. 

Lead

 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * Well scribed. Link to Virabhadra is essential, so a good inclusion.
 * Noted.


 * Link 1 fell over. It's archived here: https://web.archive.org/web/20140813022521/http://www.yogajournal.com/poses/1708
 * Added.


 * Link 3 is a brilliant reference.
 * Thank you.

Etymology and origins

 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * This section is good, breaks up the compound names and gives explanation.
 * Thank you.

Mythology

 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * Well, there are various forms of that myth. An earlier link on this page indicates that Sati she set herself ablaze by her inner yogāgni, and this explanation is inconsistent (with this section). How we might improve on this?
 * Mm, yes, we don't really want to go any deeper into all that here. I've added "One version of the myth...", which probably says all that is needed as background for Virabhadrasana.
 * The three asana poses are well explained in this section, along with the image.
 * Thank you.
 * It is most interesting that Virabhadra has 10 arms.
 * Noted.

Description

 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * Inclusive, takes in vinasya and the two Suryanamaskara poses.
 * Asanas are somewhat difficult to describe in text, well done.
 * Thank you.

Variations

 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * Reverse warrior poses well resourced.
 * Variations are well linked; explanations are good.
 * Thank you.

General Sources

 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * Noted.



Is it is Broad in its coverage?

 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * Asanas are a challenging topic to describe, yet, addressing the Virabhadrasana (and its attendant mythology) is well done.
 * Thank you.

More End Matter Stuff:

 * 1) Does it follow the neutral point of view policy?
 * Yes.

* OrenBochman * Chiswick Chap * Curb Chain
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * This page began life on 27 November 2012, and has had 212 edits. Editors have been both consistent and dedicated to page content.
 * Noted.
 * 1) Top editors are


 * 1) It is illustrated by images ?
 * Yes.
 * Gallery mode illustrates the different warrior poses.
 * All images have Creative Commons licences, ver 2,3,4
 * Noted.

Overall
Good work.
 * Thank you.

Conclusion

 * Sati. Can we get some consistency? --Whiteguru (talk) 05:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Corrections completed.