Talk:Virtual battlefield

Untitled
http://www.ainonline.com/Publications/asian/asian_04/d3_virtualp10.html http://www.irconnect.com/noc/pages/news_releases.mhtml?d=45031 http://www.uhd.edu/academic/colleges/sciences/ccsds/reports/1997/cont.html#15 http://www.is.northropgrumman.com/media_news/2003_data/mn03_mprtip_9_15.pdf#search=%22virtual%http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1.01/virthell_pr.html http://www.darwars.com/about/FAQ.html http://www.stanford.edu/dept/news/pr/93/931019Arc3095.html

Restrictive definition
I don't see the need for the restrictive declarations, especially requiring infantry, which excludes a number of military simulators that are termed "virtual battlefield"s in practice. This definition doesn't match general use, and seems to be carefully tailored to advertise one online computer game. More discussion on this argument has taken place on talk:World War II Online, so I won't re-iterate here. 64.174.34.251 22:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Edited out the restrictive language. Point taken. Nhorning 11:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Be004.jpg
The image Image:Be004.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:


 * Image:Vbs1 advanced.gif

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --09:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)