Talk:Virtuous Pedophiles

This is where you discuss changes
Hello, Your recent additions were challenged. Please try to discuss them here and get consensus Underwoods Witch (talk) 04:00, 3 September 2023 (UTC) Blocked sock. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 18:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)


 * WP:CHILDPROTECT is a user conduct policy, not content policy. There has to be a legitimate reasoning for challenging material. Other than WP:IDONTLIKEIT, there is no rational basis for removal of:
 * A couple of additional references to reliable sources (with no corresponding changes to article content).
 * Integrating this article and others with addition of §See also.
 * What is the specific content objection here? -- dsprc   [talk]  05:33, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't agree this is appropriate. I'm usually all for wp isn't censored, but child abuse friendly organizations are a line the community has drawn together Underwoods Witch (talk) 02:39, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Which links specifically are you drawing issue with? The official website link?  - Skipple   ☎  04:49, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, a link to a child harm advocacy group. I see you have readded it, and now you own it. Underwoods Witch (talk) 17:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Again, I'm not sure what you are referring to, as I haven't added any external link back in. I will ask again, which link specifically is there issue with?  - Skipple   ☎  18:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
 * At a minimum, you should probably add a warning that your link does lead to a child rape advocacy forum which is monitored by the FBI. Underwoods Witch (talk) 17:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC) Blocked sock. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 18:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Hyperbolic sock noise aside: I don't object to exclusion of official in EL (I object to gaming the system) – there's no requirement articles include them anyway. Current status quo leaving it off is fine. -- dsprc   [talk]  06:25, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Lacks neutrality
This article is immensely favorable to an organization of admitted, self-professed would-be child rapists. Without, at a minimum, a criticism section, the article fails to meet NPOV standards. Brusquedandelion (talk) 05:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)