Talk:Viséan

Requested move 23 September 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved  Dr Strauss   talk   15:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Viséan → Visean – The ICS officially recognizes Visean, without the accent, for their 2017 chronostratigraphic chart. This is a convention that should be followed. Lythronaxargestes (talk &#124; contribs) 04:11, 23 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Oppose – we need a stronger rationale to drop diacrtics, not just some official recognition of the plain version. Dicklyon (talk) 00:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose Viséan remains widely used in reliable sources. AusLondonder (talk) 03:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The image is of the wrong time
The paleogeography image used is of the late triassic/early jurassic, according to the image itself. If you look at the images for the preceding and succeeding ages the shape of the landmasses is similar to eachother but wildly different to this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smoltran (talk • contribs) 03:00, 13 January 2022 (UTC)