Talk:Vishnu

Change a Lord Vishnu Picture and add a common deception of Vishnu with four attributes.
Add a beautiful images of God Vishnu. Plz edit anyone.

2409:4071:2104:311C:827B:8D73:BE76:E78 (talk) 17:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Agree the main infobox image should be Vishnu alone, without the avatars. Redtigerxyz  Talk 17:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * There's a painting by Ravi Varma Press called Shree Vishnu that I think fulfils your criteria. According to one site it's supposedly from the 1920s - 30s. I'm still kind of murky about copyright and domain so I'm not sure how to upload it. Maybe we could get some consensus about this or another painting and try to make sure it will be here to stay before it replaces the current infobox image. Chronikhiles (talk)  03:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Add this image.
 * https://www.reddit.com/r/hinduism/comments/vlm5a8/lord_vishnu/#lightbox 2409:4071:2104:311C:B51B:6ABB:7159:D504 (talk) 04:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Not happening, this is both non-conventional and digital art. Familiarise yourself with Image use policy before you make suggestions. Chronikhiles (talk) 09:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * File:Vishnu.jpg is a good choice. Is only a picture of Viṣṇu in with four arms, blue skin, and holding conch, discus, mace, and lotus as in typical iconography. Chariotrider555 (talk) 15:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Vishnu.jpg
 * Low resolution though. Chronikhiles (talk)  17:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Here is a higher quality scan. Chariotrider555 (talk) 15:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Apart from the dim lighting, I think it could work. Chronikhiles (talk)  07:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree. This works. Redtigerxyz  Talk 10:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Vishnu from Gita Govinda.jpg
 * @Chronikhiles
 * Common_depiction_of_Vishnu_bearing_his_four_attributes.jpg Vinay viniyl (talk) 14:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Is this even public domain or just a random painting of Vishnu from Google? The artist, dating, and copyright status are all absent. We need a good representation plus these details to make an infobox image change stick. <b style="color:Teal">Chronikhiles</b> <b style="color:Black">(talk)</b>  16:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Chronikhiles, Chariotrider555 Propose the following image depicts Vishnu with the four attributes, vanamala, Kaustaubh necklace, blue colour and PD: Redtigerxyz  Talk 05:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)


 * https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/God_Vishnu.jpg Vinay viniyl (talk) 07:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * BBT images are copyrighted Redtigerxyz  Talk 11:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * God_Vishnu.jpg Vinay viniyl (talk) 08:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @Redtigerxyz I think despite the fact that Vishnu isn't generally depicted as seated, the Rajasthan school painting works. <b style="color:Teal">Chronikhiles</b> <b style="color:Black">(talk)</b>  11:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I am changing for now, until a suitable representation can be found. We may also consider the following: Redtigerxyz  Talk 11:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Vishnu Kumartuli Park Sarbojanin Arnab Dutta 2010.JPG
 * User:Redtigerxyz, the image you suggest seems to struggle with balancing traditional painting style with Western influence, which is a bit off-putting artistically. Vishnu faces directly toward the viewer, but the artist does not seem to have a strong grasp on painting faces in Western photorealistic style nor proper 3D perspective. I think for an infobox image, the depiction should try to remain within a more firmly traditional depiction of painting or perhaps a pre-modern sculpture or idol of Vishnu. Chariotrider555 (talk) 15:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Based on my experience, I think conventional paintings, immaterial of school, are generally the preferred representations of Hindu deities on the infobox. Of course, it's not a rule (Krishna, Lakshmana) but I'd personally be for a painting. <b style="color:Teal">Chronikhiles</b> <b style="color:Black">(talk)</b>  07:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * In talk page we didn't discuss about this image, we suggest only authentic image,Why you changed the old photo, atleast add previous image idol of Vishnu,see other Hindu deities, can you make changes? This is very propaganda on Vaishnavism.I know you are shaivism, you jealous on Bhagavan Vishnu. Shame on you.
 * @Redtigerxyz
 * @Chronikhiles
 * @joshu Jonathan
 * @Dougweller
 * @Chariotrider555
 * @Hinduism 2409:4071:4D85:A5DC:DC44:72FF:E2F8:2D40 (talk) 12:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lord_Narayana.jpg Vinay viniyl (talk) 08:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Lord Narayana.jpg
 * Vinay viniyl (talk) 08:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * This Narayana image was once used in this article and deleted due to sourcing issues. Redtigerxyz  Talk 11:01, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * why you add this ugly old Vishnu image, why you so much jealous on Lord Vishnu. See other Hindu deities in Wikipedia, how beautiful, but you always changes related to Vaishnavism. Wikipedia is not your private property. See and search in Wiki media common, there is so much Vishnu images, upload the one, delete current image, hey red tiger delete it.
 * @Redtigerxyz
 * @Chronikhiles
 * @Chariotrider555
 * @Joshua Jonathan
 * @Dougweller
 * @Krsnaquli 2409:4071:4D85:A5DC:5B60:8CAA:1723:8DC9 (talk) 14:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Dear anon, The current image is IMO is beautiful; a historical image with a suitable license, the dark blue complexion, the four attributes - shankha chakra padma gada, the vanamala, the kaustaubha. The image was discussed in the discussion above. Please upload an image with suitable license and more beautiful with suitable iconography; we can discuss the same here and change the image. Redtigerxyz  Talk 11:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Then why not also change God shiva Wikipedia images, then we appreciate it, see everyone as equal, then also change God Vishnu Wiki image as statue, there is so many statue of Vishnu in world eg like garuda wisnu, Angkor wat, etc ...... @Redtigerxyz 2409:4071:D41:5B96:B2DF:D5E2:626A:BBAA (talk) 10:48, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Dear Anon, you are welcome to suggest a suitable image  Redtigerxyz  Talk 14:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ef/Vishnu_from_Gita_Govinda.jpg
 * This above image best for Vaishnavaism article, this image is also in thumbnail, add this image to Vaishnavism and change God Vishnu image in Wikipedia and add sculptures of Vishnu in Wiki image, there are so many statue of Vishnu in the world, for example garuda wisnu, Angkor wat temple statue, etc,....
 * @Redtigerxyz 2409:4071:D41:5B96:9194:F111:C1AC:BB74 (talk) 11:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Chariotrider555@Chronikhiles@Redtigerxyz
 * I'm going to semi this page for a few days. Let's just assume they are all one editor. Doug Weller  talk 13:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Vinay viniyl you are a blocked sock. Doug Weller  talk 13:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

About editing.
Why content deleted, Vaishnavism means worshiper of vishnu, the word vaishnavism comes from vishnu alone,

So plz edit correct word sentence such as remove within, just add He is supreme Being in vaishnavism , add in , see shavisim wiki they also in and added content link text paramatman for vishnu affilition , in shiva wikipedia they also add same content paramatman see it and remove supreme being, add Vishnu is Supreme Lord who creates , protects and transform the universe. In deity shiva wikipedia there is lot of difference they added own supremacy content, so plz edit my request, see everyone as equal in Hindu deities especially to Lord Vishnu.

Correct Edit :


 * 1) He is supreme being in vaishnavism. (Remove  - within )
 * 2) Add content [Paramatma ]to affilition
 * 3) And finally add in Vaishnavism Vishnu is Supreme Lord who creates, protects and transform the universe.     (Remove - supreme being )                     I Kindly request to you plz correct word and sentence formation.                @Chronikhiles



Vinay viniyl (talk) 04:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


 * In and within literally mean the same thing within the specified context. You can go ahead and add Paramatman in the infobox if you want as long as you follow it up with (Vaishnavism). As for the Supreme Lord/Being nuance, I suggest you open this as a separate discussion on the talk page so that alignment can be reached between both articles. Please don't make modifications to sourced content as you did before. <b style="color:Teal">Chronikhiles</b> <b style="color:Black">(talk)</b>  06:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * can you plz add this image for vaishnavism.
 * @Chronikhiles @Redtigerxyz
 * [[File:Vishnu_(below)_is_the_primary_deity_of_Vaishnavism._Ritual_at_budhaneelakantha_temple,_Kathmandu,_Nepal.jpg|thumb|Worship rituals on banks of budhaneelakantha temple, Kathmandu, Nepal]]
 * Vinay viniyl (talk) 07:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Add image.
This image is added in avatar, dashavatar and vaishnavism and why not also add to vishnu wikipedia, All in one four image.

@Redtigerxyz

@Joshua Jonathan

@Chronikhiles

Actually this link is not opened in wiki common, can you deleted it, ?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Vishnu_Avatars.jpg

Vinay viniyl (talk) 08:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You are a sock of indef blocked User:Vinayvinyill. I don't understand why you're still being allowed to edit. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 09:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


 * see comment above. Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!  10:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Ponyo blocked the sock. Doug Weller talk 13:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

About Wikipedia edit.
Wikipedia users promote lot of vandalism and fake poorly sourced information on Hindu deities especially to God Vishnu. They add beautiful images/statue for other deities but in Vishnu wiki page they add old ugly photo, same image for avatar, dashavatar and Vaishnavism artist, they image link not opened in web, atleast they didn't change images. World encyclopaedia is much better than Wikipedia. @Chronikhiles @Chariotrider555 @Classicwiki @Redtigerxyz 2409:4071:D8D:F611:0:0:6548:5313 (talk) 14:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * If you can't see past your misinformed accusations and refuse to be constructive within existing policy, you're wasting everyone's time. Also, nobody's forcing you to use Wikipedia. <b style="color:Teal">Chronikhiles</b> <b style="color:Black">(talk)</b> 02:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Oh once again changes images. Why ?

What a irony and propaganda by wiki users,

“Adding old image and few info for vishnu wiki page and using Good statue and more info on shiva wiki article page

Dear wiki users, @Redtigerxyz @Chronikhiles @Chariotrider555 @Dāsānudāsa

What a irony and propaganda by wiki users, “Adding old image and few info for vishnu wiki page and using Good statue and more info on shiva wiki article page

So many jealous and hyprocisy to God vishnu. That why now present age is kaliyuga. Even unrighteous is also happening in wikipedia. They are always wait for editing, even wiki accept chance for good rdit, but this so called users didnt get digest when we edit good faiths. World Encyclopedia is 10000 times better than wiki. User : God devotee 10:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You need to seek WP:CONSENSUS for your changes, rather than WP:EDITWARring. Please read WP:BRD for an understanding of how this works. Your changes have been rejected by other editors and you can't just keep trying to shoehorn them through. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 11:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @God devotee If you don't have anything sensible to say, I'd thank you to stop tagging me. <b style="color:Teal">Chronikhiles</b> <b style="color:Black">(talk)</b> 15:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Blocking the sockpuppet
It is so evident that this user @Cosmology dreamer is a sockpuppet of blocked account named @god devotee, he is continuously vandalising the pages and deleting the discussions from talk page which were started against him. Please complete the investigation and block him asap.@Abecedare @Doug Weller @Joshua Jonathan Hbanm (talk) 05:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Someone is targeting and attack me by adding my username to talk page with unnecessary text. I first time join Wikipedia, I add only neutral point of view and reliable source, but this account continuosly reverted my edit and add my username in talk page. Anyone can plz help me.
 * @Abecedarw
 * @Dougweller
 * @Joshua Jonathan User : Cosmology dreamer  06:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cosmology dreamer (talk • contribs)
 * I think it's pretty obvious Cosmology dreamer is Vinayvinyill/God devotee/assorted IPs. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 09:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Dāsānudāsa
 * What is this ? who are these user names,
 * if any doubts regards my, any one can investigate me, i can clarrify all doubts ? User : Cosmology dreamer  10:42, 17 June 2024 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cosmology dreamer (talk • contribs)

Comment
Text necessary info to vishnu wiki page such as,

By Adding, Destroyer of Evil, concept of Vishnu Avatar is protector of righteousness (good) and destroyer of u righteousness (evil) ,so it is necessary to add this word before bestower of karma. Narayana Name quote name by redirect link in below before The supreme being (vaishnavism)  and by removing  same title name link  in other names

"Narayana" is not just another name or form of vishnu, narayana is aspect and important Epithet of vishnu deity.

it is necessary to add this names, because Entire description scriptures information found in this Narayana wiki article.

when i edit it, someone again reverted, it's any doubts anyone came discuss me, I answer for all debate it's necessary neutral point by good faiths or reverted my edits in vishnu wiki page history as reverted good faith.

Blocking the sock
This sock @Cosmology dreamer is now literally causing menance with his vandalism. Even a blind person can see that he is a sockpuppet of @Vinayvinyill and @god devotee. Will you please complete the investigation and block him for God's sake.@Abecedare @Doug Weller @Joshua Jonathan @Redtigerxyz @Dāsānudāsa Hbanm (talk) 12:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Done. I'm the only one you pinged who can CU, although @Abecedare is an Admin he doesn't have checkuser. Sorry, I've been tired. I may not be able to help much once I start more chemo next month. Doug Weller  talk 14:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * All the best with the chemo. I'm on cycle 30-something myself and it's exhausting. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 15:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * All the best for your chemo, you're a fighter. Wish you the very best. Hbanm (talk) 17:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)