Talk:Vision of Love/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Blackjacks101 (talk) 13:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Since I see that there was a miscommunication, I'll gladly step in to review it.--Blackjacks101 (talk) 13:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you :). Yes I don't know what happened. I could have sworn it was under review las t week :S-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   19:36, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): (citations to reliable sources):  (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Wow great article to easily read through! It was terrific! Just one problem, the image of Carey performing Someday is being nominated for deletion, you may want to remove it. (Which sucks since it fits in perfectly). Yet other than that everything looks good!--Blackjacks101 (talk) 13:34, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Everything has been fixed =D..passing--Blackjacks101 (talk) 15:11, 14 March 2011 (UTC)