Talk:Visual crowding

Visual crowding article versus crowding article
I think "visual crowding" (this article) is more appropriate than "[|crowding]". The literature is almost exclusively about a visual phenomena, and the relation to other modalities is less clear. And, of course, outside of science, "crowding" could refer to all sorts of things. Aoholcombe (talk) 20:51, 16 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Alex. You are right, both articles are about the visual case; i.e., the described phenomenon is the same. The confusion arose when the article “visual crowding” was drafted in 2019, even though there already was a reasonably good article on the topic (named "crowding") that started in 2012.
 * The new article is better structured but then some parts in the original article are better. The solution could be merging the two and eventually inserting a redirect from “crowding” to “visual crowding. Strasburger (talk) 14:10, 19 September 2022 (UTC)