Talk:Visy

Impartiality of Controversy Section
The article is likely written by someone at Visy, given the detail level. This in itself is not a bad thing. However I think the controversy section could use some more work. The price fixing items should be expanded to be more in line with the detail in the Richard Pratt article - although the article here lists the conduct as "Alleged" the other article points out the court has "This is the worst cartel to come before the courts in 30-plus years," and "There can be no suggestion that Visy acted in ignorance of its obligations under the act,"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.170.5.5 (talk) 01:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

American-Australian.
It should be an Australian-American company. They expanded to the USA. 2001:8003:64B0:F201:A57A:207C:BB76:2901 (talk) 12:56, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Good point. Changed. Damien Linnane (talk) 01:20, 5 September 2022 (UTC)