Talk:Vithoba/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Vithoba/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

✅ --Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:12, 14 July 2008 (UTC) ✅ --Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:12, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Expand the lead to better summarize the entire article.
 * " Bibliography" section should be sorted last name, first name.
 * Remove the periods at the end of image captions that are not sentences per WP:MOS.

Gary King ( talk ) 01:22, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. It is a great co-incidence that the GA review comes on the holy day of Ashadhi Ekadashi - the biggest festival of Vithoba.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:12, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

✅ If you feel some points are missing, please tell the sections, I will be happy to improve the article.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC) ✅ --Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC) ✅ --Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Lead should be significantly expanded and probably split into two paragraphs, per WP:LEAD
 * Also, some very stubby (and unreferenced) paragraphs including "There are numerous, conflicting theories about the origins of the names of the deity.", and "Another name Pandharinath relates to Vithoba being "the lord of Pandhari (a name of Pandharpur)".
 * "There are numerous, conflicting theories about the origins of the names of the deity." does not need a ref as 4-5 diff theories that do not support each other are listed. The sentence can be removed by the reviewer, if he feels
 * Ref for Pandharinath added.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * "Krishna[38]) on t" – ref goes after punctuation marks per WP:FN
 * "is a 3 feet 9 inches tall," – measurements such as this should be converted to metric units as well, preferably with convert

Gary King ( talk ) 05:19, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Overall great job. This article meets the Good Article criteria and has therefore been passed. Gary King ( talk ) 17:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)