Talk:Vito Palumbo

--Sara7784 (talk) 21:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Untitled
How can I solve these problems? --Sara7784 (talk) 21:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC) ""This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (November 2016) Unbalanced scales. This article reads like a press release, or is otherwise written in a promotional tone. Please help by rewriting this article from a neutral point of view. When appropriate, blatant advertising may be marked for speedy deletion with db-spam. (November 2016)""


 * In short, this needs much better references. Some of the sources don't even give a single sentence of human-written content about Palumbo. The one source that discusses him in some detail is an author profile, not independent coverage, and even that source does not serve to confirm the article's content. Where are the independent reports about his life and career? Where are the critical assessments of Palumbo's work? Instead, the article is a long list of works and supposedly impressive accomplishments that, for all the article shows, nobody considered important enough to report on. Huon (talk) 22:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

--Sara7784 (talk) 15:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)