Talk:Viva Ned Flanders/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  R uby2010   comment!  23:52, 12 May 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * Wikilink Fox network
 * "Springfield is without a casino when Mr. Burns' Casino is demolished. However, a confusion over whether demolitions are supposed to involve implosions or explosions results in the casino being blasted into a huge dust cloud. " This may be out of order. When was the casino demolished? Your wording implies it is destroyed two times.
 * Wikilink hitchhiking
 * How do David M. Stern and Neil Affleck relate to the show (producers? etc)
 * "The morning after having drinking extensively," Fix
 * "wether " -> whether
 * 'since it would "raise some question."' Raise some question, or questions?
 * It's question. Queenieacoustic (talk) 13:19, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * "christian's travel" Capitalize Christian
 * "On August 7, 2007, the episode was released as part of The Simpsons: The Complete Tenth Season DVD set." Needs ref
 * This is not a reliable ref. I'm sure you can find something better, considering the popular topic.

Also, make sure direct quotes have refs directly after the sentence (even if the same citation covers the following sentence). I've found a bunch of examples in the article. Other than that and the comments above, the article looks really good. Awesome job researching it! I'll place it on hold for seven days to be fixed. Thanks,  R uby2010   comment!  00:13, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I think I've fixed all the issues now, if there's anything else, just tell me. Queenieacoustic (talk) 13:19, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Just add a publisher for ref #9, and it will be good to go.  R uby2010   comment!  15:54, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. Thanks for the review! Queenieacoustic (talk) 21:02, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks good! Pass for GA. Nice work,  R uby2010   comment!  22:18, 13 May 2011 (UTC)