Talk:Vivek Ramaswamy 2024 presidential campaign

Religion?
Why doesn't this page have anything about his religion, which has been reported by many WP:RS? Nbauman (talk) 18:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If you have reliable sources discussing the role of Ramaswamy's religion in his presidential campaign, you can post them here. His religion is described in the Ramaswamy article in the sections Personal life and Early life and education. -- M.boli (talk) 19:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * His religion is covered in his personal article, this article is more focused on his presidential 2024 campaign. For any mention of his religion, it would have to be in association somehow in reliable sources with his campaign. MaximusEditor (talk) 16:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Should the article be changed to past tense?
For example, instead of "he opposes abortion" it would say "he opposed abortion." NesserWiki (talk) 04:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I suppose it matters on the use case. If we are talking about positions held in relativity to his campaign, I suppose past tense would be used.  But if it is just a position held indefinitely, he probably still holds those positions in present tense. MaximusEditor (talk) 21:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Bias in the Writers
When referencing Ramaswamy's arguments on the president's authority to disband federal agencies, the added clause "Legal scholars say this is not true." should be removed. For one, it is not the job of wiki to refute the things that Ramaswamy has said. Only to record them. For two, it's completely arbitrary. You can find legal scholars who will argue that what Ramaswamy said is correct as well. Ultimately, neither's opinion matters, because the ones who determine whether or not the president has that power are the judges on the supreme court. Added "context" like this just shows how embarrassingly biased the writers of this article are. 152.7.255.239 (talk) 18:40, 11 March 2024 (UTC)