Talk:Volvo 900 Series

940 photo
needs a good photo of the front of the euro/aust spec 940 which was quite different to the us spec.--Lotsofmagnets (talk) 10:23, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism of introduction year
OK somebody has definitely vandlized the year this car was introduced; It was introduced in 1990, not 1982.Kevjgav (talk) 16:14, 30 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I think it was just a leftover from being split off from the Volvo 700-series, which was introduced in 1982. And thanks for fixing it.  ⊂&#124; Mr.choppers &#124;⊃   (talk) 18:38, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Something very wrong with engines table
Many of the engines show 1Nm torque and displacement of 1cc. I'm guessing the information is simply incomplete but I'm sure it'd be better to simply leave the data out rather than leave completely wrong values in.

If somebody has the info, I'll leave it for them to populate.

I repaid a lot of datas about it. Mohos Koppány (talk) 10:59, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Repaired** Mohos Koppány (talk) 11:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Why is the 850 mentioned?
Why is this text in the article at all? The 850 has very little to do with the 900 except that they were sold at the same time as each other. They're different sizes and drive layouts. Further, the part that really bothers me is "The range was first augmented and finally supplanted by 850". The 900 lasted a year longer than the 850 so it's just not correct to say the 900 was "supplanted" by the 850. I noticed the same thing appears in the 700 article so I'm guessing that this text was originally there and then copied here. 130.45.43.153 (talk) 15:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I think augmented and supplanted is mostly correct, but, yes, there should be fewer mentions of the 850.  Mr.choppers &#124;   ✎  13:02, 31 December 2019 (UTC)