Talk:Volvopluteus earlei/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 18:00, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Nominator: Sasata (talk)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. -- Seabuckthorn   ♥  18:00, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written
 * a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

Check for WP:LEAD:


 * 1) Check for Correct Structure of Lead Section:  ✅
 * 2) Check for Citations (WP:LEADCITE):  ✅
 * 3) Check for Introductory text:  ✅
 * 4) * Check for Provide an accessible overview (MOS:INTRO): ✅
 * 5) ** Major Point 1: Taxonomy "It was previously known under the name Volvariella earlei but molecular studies have placed it in the Volvopluteus, a genus newly described in 2011." ( not a concise summary of the Taxonomy section )
 * 6) ** Major Point 2: Description "The cap of this mushroom … and has a volva at the base." ( not a concise summary of the Description section )
 * 7) ** Major Point 3: Habitat, distribution, and ecology "A saprotrophic fungus that grows on grassy fields, V. earlei has been reported from Africa, Europe, and North America." (summarised well in the lead)
 * 8) ** Major Point 4: Similar species "Microscopic features … presence or absence and form of cystidia." (summarised well in the lead)
 * 9) * Check for Relative emphasis: ✅
 * 10) ** Major Point 1: Taxonomy "It was previously known under the name Volvariella earlei but molecular studies have placed it in the Volvopluteus, a genus newly described in 2011." ( the lead does not give due weight as is given in the body )
 * 11) ** Major Point 2: Description "The cap of this mushroom … and has a volva at the base." ( the lead does not give due weight as is given in the body )
 * 12) ** Major Point 3: Habitat, distribution, and ecology "A saprotrophic fungus that grows on grassy fields, V. earlei has been reported from Africa, Europe, and North America." (the lead gives due weight as is given in the body)
 * 13) ** Major Point 4: Similar species "Microscopic features … presence or absence and form of cystidia." (the lead gives due weight as is given in the body)
 * 14) * Check for Opening paragraph (MOS:BEGIN): ✅
 * 15) ** Check for First sentence (WP:LEADSENTENCE): ✅
 * 16) *** Volvopluteus earlei is a species of mushroom in the family Pluteaceae.
 * 17) ** Check for Format of the first sentence (MOS:BOLDTITLE): ✅
 * 18) ** Check for Proper names and titles: ✅
 * 19) ** Check for Abbreviations and synonyms (MOS:BOLDSYN): None
 * 20) ** Check for Foreign language (MOS:FORLANG): None
 * 21) ** Check for Pronunciation: None
 * 22) ** Check for Contextual links (MOS:CONTEXTLINK): ✅
 * 23) ** Check for Biographies: NA
 * 24) ** Check for Organisms: ✅
 * 25) Check for Biographies of living persons:  NA
 * 26) Check for Alternative names (MOS:LEADALT):  ✅
 * 27) * Check for Non-English titles:
 * 28) * Check for Usage in first sentence:
 * 29) * Check for Separate section usage:
 * 30) Check for Length (WP:LEADLENGTH):  ✅
 * 31) * The lead should be expanded.
 * 32) Check for Clutter (WP:LEADCLUTTER):  None

✅

Check for WP:LAYOUT: ✅


 * 1) Check for Body sections: WP:BODY, MOS:BODY.  ✅
 * 2) * Check for Headings and sections: ✅
 * 3) * Check for Section templates and summary style: ✅
 * 4) * Check for Paragraphs (MOS:PARAGRAPHS): ✅
 * 5) ** Paragraphs should be short enough to be readable, but long enough to develop an idea. (WP:BETTER)
 * 6) ** Fix "The specific epithet earlei … of the New York Botanical Garden." in the Taxonomy section.
 * 7) Check for Standard appendices and footers (MOS:APPENDIX):  ✅
 * 8) * Check for Order of sections (WP:ORDER): ✅
 * 9) * Check for Works or publications: ✅
 * 10) * Check for See also section (MOS:SEEALSO): None
 * 11) * Check for Notes and references (WP:FNNR): ✅
 * 12) * Check for Further reading (WP:FURTHER): ✅
 * 13) * Check for External links (WP:LAYOUTEL): None
 * 14) * Check for Links to sister projects: None
 * 15) * Check for Navigation templates: ✅
 * 16) Check for Formatting:  ✅
 * 17) * Check for Images (WP:LAYIM): ✅
 * 18) * Check for Links: ✅
 * 19) * Check for Horizontal rule (WP:LINE): ✅

✅

Check for WP:WTW: ✅


 * 1) Check for Words that may introduce bias:  ✅
 * 2) * Check for Puffery (WP:PEA): ✅
 * 3) * Check for Contentious labels (WP:LABEL): ✅
 * 4) * Check for Unsupported attributions (WP:WEASEL): ✅
 * 5) * Check for Expressions of doubt (WP:ALLEGED): ✅
 * 6) * Check for Editorializing (MOS:OPED): ✅
 * 7) * Check for Synonyms for said (WP:SAY): ✅
 * 8) Check for Expressions that lack precision:  ✅
 * 9) * Check for Euphemisms (WP:EUPHEMISM): ✅
 * 10) * Check for Clichés and idioms (WP:IDIOM): ✅
 * 11) * Check for Relative time references (WP:REALTIME): ✅
 * 12) * Check for Neologisms (WP:PEA): None
 * 13) Check for Offensive material (WP:F***):  ✅

Check for WP:MOSFICT: ✅


 * 1) Check for Real-world perspective (WP:Real world):  ✅
 * 2) * Check for Primary and secondary information (WP:PASI): ✅
 * 3) * Check for Contextual presentation (MOS:PLOT): ✅

None


 * Prose is preferred over list (WP:PROSE):
 * Check for Tables (MOS:TABLES):

2: Verifiable with no original research
 * a. Has an appropriate reference section: Yes
 * b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with other FAs)

✅

Check for WP:RS: ✅

Cross-checked with other FAs: Agaricus deserticola, Albatrellus subrubescens, Armillaria gallica, Armillaria luteobubalina, Astraeus hygrometricus, Auriscalpium vulgare, Boletus badius, Boletus calopus, Boletus edulis, Boletus frostii, Boletus luridus, Chalciporus piperatus, Coprinellus micaceus, Cyathus, Dendrocollybia, Fungus, Galerina marginata, Geastrum triplex, Geastrum quadrifidum, Lactarius torminosus, Lactarius volemus, Lycoperdon echinatum, Lycoperdon perlatum, Marasmius rotula, Mycena aurantiomarginata, Paxillus involutus, Phallus indusiatus, Polyozellus, Psilocybe aztecorum, Psilocybe semilanceata, Ramaria botrytis, Rhodotus, Russula emetica, Russula virescens, Sarcoscypha coccinea, Suillus brevipes, Suillus pungens, Suillus salmonicolor, Suillus spraguei, Tricholoma pardinum, Tylopilus felleus, Verpa bohemica


 * 1) Check for the material (WP:RSVETTING):  (not contentious) ✅
 * 2) * Is it contentious?: No
 * 3) * Does the ref indeed support the material?:
 * 4) Check for the author (WP:RSVETTING):  ✅
 * 5) * Who is the author?:
 * 6) * Does the author have a Wikipedia article?:
 * 7) * What are the author's academic credentials and professional experience?:
 * 8) * What else has the author published?:
 * 9) * Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works?:
 * 10) Check for the publication (WP:RSVETTING):  ✅
 * 11) Check for Self-published sources (WP:SPS):

✅

Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: ✅


 * 1) Check for Direct quotations:  ✅
 * 2) Check for Likely to be challenged:  ✅
 * 3) Check for Contentious material about living persons (WP:BLP):  NA


 * c. No original research: ✅

✅


 * 1) Check for primary sources (WP:PRIMARY):  ✅
 * 2) Check for synthesis (WP:SYN):  ✅
 * 3) Check for original images (WP:OI):  ✅

3: Broad in its coverage

✅

Cross-checked with other FAs: Agaricus deserticola, Albatrellus subrubescens, Armillaria gallica, Armillaria luteobubalina, Astraeus hygrometricus, Auriscalpium vulgare, Boletus badius, Boletus calopus, Boletus edulis, Boletus frostii, Boletus luridus, Chalciporus piperatus, Coprinellus micaceus, Cyathus, Dendrocollybia, Fungus, Galerina marginata, Geastrum triplex, Geastrum quadrifidum, Lactarius torminosus, Lactarius volemus, Lycoperdon echinatum, Lycoperdon perlatum, Marasmius rotula, Mycena aurantiomarginata, Paxillus involutus, Phallus indusiatus, Polyozellus, Psilocybe aztecorum, Psilocybe semilanceata, Ramaria botrytis, Rhodotus, Russula emetica, Russula virescens, Sarcoscypha coccinea, Suillus brevipes, Suillus pungens, Suillus salmonicolor, Suillus spraguei, Tricholoma pardinum, Tylopilus felleus, Verpa bohemica


 * 1) Check for Article scope as defined by reliable sources:
 * 2) Check for The extent of the subject matter in these RS:
 * 3) Check for Out of scope:
 * 4) Check for The range of material that belongs in the article:
 * 5) Check for All material that is notable is covered:
 * 6) Check for All material that is referenced is covered:
 * 7) Check for All material that a reader would be likely to agree matches the specified scope is covered:
 * 8) Check for The most general scope that summarises essentially all knowledge:
 * 9) Check for Stay on topic and no wandering off-topic (WP:OFFTOPIC):

✅


 * 1) Check for Readability issues (WP:LENGTH):
 * 2) Check for Article size (WP:TOO LONG!):

4: Neutral

✅

4. Fair representation without bias: ✅


 * 1) Check for POV (WP:YESPOV):  ✅
 * 2) Check for naming (WP:POVNAMING):  ✅
 * 3) Check for structure (WP:STRUCTURE):  ✅
 * 4) Check for Due and undue weight (WP:DUE):  ✅
 * 5) Check for Balancing aspects (WP:BALASPS):  ✅
 * 6) Check for Giving "equal validity" (WP:VALID):  ✅
 * 7) Check for Balance (WP:YESPOV):  ✅
 * 8) Check for Impartial tone (WP:IMPARTIAL):  ✅
 * 9) Check for Describing aesthetic opinions (WP:SUBJECTIVE):  ✅
 * 10) Check for Words to watch (WP:YESPOV):  ✅
 * 11) Check for Attributing and specifying biased statements (WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV):  ✅
 * 12) Check for Fringe theories and pseudoscience (WP:PSCI):  None
 * 13) Check for Religion (WP:RNPOV):  None

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes

6: Images ✅ (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license)

✅

6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: ✅


 * 1) Check for copyright tags (WP:TAGS):  ✅
 * 2) Check for copyright status:  ✅
 * 3) Check for non-free content (WP:NFC):  None
 * 4) Check for valid fair use rationales (WP:FUR):  NA

6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: ✅


 * 1) Check for image relevance (WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE):  ✅
 * 2) Check for Images for the lead (WP:LEADIMAGE):  ✅
 * 3) Check for suitable captions (WP:CAPTION):  ✅

As per the above checklist, the issues identified are :
 * The lead does not provide an accessible overview and does not give relative emphasis.
 * The lead should be expanded.
 * The layout needs to be fixed.

This article is a very promising GA nominee. I’m glad to see your work here. All the best, --  Seabuckthorn   ♥  07:33, 25 January 2014 (UTC)\
 * Thank-you for your review! I have made a series of edits that I believe should address your comments above. Let me know if there are any further improvements you would like implemented. Sasata (talk) 07:44, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks --  Seabuckthorn   ♥  08:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Promoting the article to GA status. -- Seabuckthorn   ♥  08:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)