Talk:Voretigene neparvovec

Needs update, Dec 17
Ideally by an expert. See 2017 in science for details and references. --mfb (talk) 08:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * That's a big page; which bits are relevant to this article ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

More info on development
I think that because this is the first gene therapy, it would be nice to have a lot of info about the development, which seems to be removed from a lot of drug articles. Natureium (talk) 16:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

adisinsight.springer.com refs look like advertising
The adisinsight.springer.com ref is just a link to an undated (and changing) summary page asking for payment. Would it be unreasonable to ask for a better (ideally free) source ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)