Talk:Vulgar (film)

Fair use rationale for Image:Vulgarposter.jpg
Image:Vulgarposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Vulgarposter.jpg
Image:Vulgarposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

re: Dubious
Walt Flanagan's dog is mentioned...he's only known within the Askewniverse, so this might set Vulgar in the same world. DodgerOfZion (talk) 23:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Clean up and Expansion
This article is too short and only has a single source cited in it. There article needs to be rewritten and expanded with more sources added to the article. The production section is poorly written and needs to be rewritten and expanded. More information on the film's reception needs to be added as well with more reviews from notable critics added. The article is also missing information on the film's release which needs to be added to the article. All of these changes and additions need to occur on order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards of a well developed and well sourced article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 21:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Checking up on this article I've noticed that, unfortunately that this article will need to be completely rewritten. The production section is poorly written and unsourced and needs to be rewritten/reformatted so that all pieces of information is properly sourced from reliable sources. The release and Reception section should be split into separate sections, with the release section have a home media sub section that details each of the film's releases to DVD, Blue-ray, and VHS. The reception section will need to be expanded, with more reviews from notable critics. It is unfortunate that this article is in the state that it's in, hopefully comes along and gives it the attention it needs to reach its full potential.--Paleface Jack 20:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)